Getting a crypto license in Indonesia today means joining one of Asia's fastest-growing crypto markets. However, the rules and regulations are getting more organized, regulated, and severe every year. Over the past five years, Indonesia has evolved into a serious magnet for fintech startups, crypto exchanges, and blockchain platforms looking to expand into a region with massive demographic scale and strong digital adoption. At the same time, regulators have been busy building a dense legal framework aimed at transparency, consumer protection, and tight control over digital asset circulation.
Since 2021, cryptocurrencies in Indonesia have been legally recognized as tradable commodities, while their use as a means of payment remains prohibited. This legal design opened the door for legitimate operations with digital financial assets — but only within the boundaries of crypto licensing in Indonesia. In practice, this means crypto activity is allowed, but only for those willing to play strictly by the rules.
Until 2025, regulatory oversight sat with the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (BAPPEBTI). That chapter has now closed. Supervisory authority over digital financial assets has been formally transferred to the Financial Services Authority (OJK), signaling a shift toward a more centralized and integrated approach to digital finance regulation, including obtaining Indonesian authorization for blockchain businesses. This transition has not been cosmetic. It has reshaped licensing requirements, raised expectations around internal controls, corporate governance, and reporting standards, and increased scrutiny over how crypto companies are structured and operated.
This article takes a close look at the current realities of obtaining a crypto license in Indonesia, outlines the most recent regulatory changes, and is intended for blockchain founders and investors who want to operate legally — and sustainably — within this rapidly tightening jurisdiction.
Crypto Licensing in Indonesia: The Law That Keeps the Market on a Short Leash
Crypto licensing in Indonesia is built on a tightly controlled legal framework designed to absorb digital assets into the national financial system without letting them run wild. The rules clearly outline which crypto activities are allowed, how licenses must be obtained, and what internal controls companies are expected to maintain. Compliance here is not decorative — it is structural. The regulatory environment is shaped by multiple state bodies and adjusted frequently as the crypto market evolves and new technologies emerge.
Regulatory Realignment and the New Power Map
Until the beginning of 2025, supervision of digital financial assets sat with BAPPEBTI, the authority overseeing commodity futures trading. Under this model, cryptocurrencies were legally classified as tradable commodities, which placed exchanges and service providers squarely within BAPPEBTI’s licensing perimeter. This approach treated crypto as a market instrument rather than a financial service.
That model ended on January 10, 2025. Regulatory control over the crypto sector was formally handed over to the Financial Services Authority (OJK). With this shift, digital financial assets were pulled into Indonesia’s broader financial supervision system, subject to prudential oversight, stricter reporting, and deeper scrutiny of internal governance. The transition was anchored in binding legislation and came with a full redistribution of responsibilities, including operational transparency, consumer protection, and infrastructure reliability.
Bank Indonesia retained authority over monetary circulation and payment systems. While it does not license crypto businesses, it remains influential at the junction between crypto and fiat finance, particularly in policy discussions around payment rails and the digital rupiah.
The result is a layered regulatory structure: strategic monetary direction at the central bank level, with crypto licensing and operational supervision consolidated under the financial regulator. It’s a system designed to allow crypto activity — but only under close, centralized supervision.
Crypto Assets in Indonesia: Not Money, but the Machinery Behind Modern Finance
Indonesia’s regulatory logic treats crypto assets with surgical precision. They are deliberately excluded from the status of legal tender, yet firmly embedded into the country’s fintech vision as instruments of technological evolution rather than monetary replacement. This approach is formalized through the classification of crypto products and services as Inovasi Teknologi Sektor Keuangan (ITSK) — financial-sector technology innovations that reshape how the system works without challenging the rupiah’s monopoly as the sole means of payment.
By anchoring crypto within the ITSK framework, Indonesian law grants the Financial Services Authority (OJK) exclusive authority to assess crypto projects, supervise their operation, and issue permits for digital asset activities. Crypto, in this model, is not positioned as a rival to the national currency. Instead, it is treated as infrastructure — the plumbing behind modern payment solutions, investment tools, and value-storage services.
This framing allows the regulator to design a granular supervisory model focused on technological robustness, consumer exposure, and impact on financial flows, while preserving the rupiah’s role as the only lawful settlement instrument within the country.
The Regulatory Architecture Governing Digital Financial Assets
Indonesia’s crypto licensing and supervision framework is built as a layered legal system, where each regulatory instrument serves a specific function within a unified structure. At its core lies Law No. 4 of 2023, adopted to strengthen the financial sector institutionally and to create a formal gateway for integrating technological innovation into capital markets and payment regulation. This law legitimizes fintech solutions within a regulated environment and establishes baseline eligibility criteria for digital market participants.
On top of this foundation sit implementing regulations that translate legal principles into operational mechanisms — including procedures for obtaining authorization for blockchain-based businesses in Indonesia. Regulation No. 5/2019 was the first instrument to classify cryptocurrencies as tradable assets, laying the groundwork for their circulation on regulated platforms.
With supervisory authority now consolidated under OJK, the regulatory landscape expanded further through Regulation No. 27/2024, which defines the procedures for applying for an Indonesian crypto license. This regulation also introduces internal certification and technological assessment requirements for market participants, setting mandatory standards for information systems, internal monitoring frameworks, and cyber-incident response protocols.
Complementing this structure is Circular Letter No. 20/SEOJK.07/2024, which drills down into operational expectations for digital financial asset trading entities. It specifies platform reliability thresholds, consumer protection standards, and disclosure obligations — including mandatory notification to the regulator of any changes in infrastructure or management models.
Taken together, this framework blends a foundational statute, system-forming regulations, and detailed supervisory directives into a cohesive regulatory environment. The result is a tightly controlled but clearly articulated system that governs crypto activity in Indonesia with an emphasis on technology, transparency, and institutional oversight rather than monetary substitution.
Crypto Licensing in Indonesia: Permissions, Transitions, and Who Gets to Stay in the Game
To operate a platform dealing with digital financial assets, a company must first secure formal authorization to conduct crypto activity in Indonesia. The Financial Services Authority (OJK) holds exclusive power to issue licenses to entities providing exchange services, custody solutions, transaction support, or execution of client orders involving digital assets. The legal right of crypto exchanges, brokerage firms, and custodial operators to function within the jurisdiction depends entirely on compliance with the regulatory framework governing the ITSK sector.
Without completing the crypto licensing process in Indonesia, companies are not permitted to offer services, market products, or promote any activity that grants access to crypto assets. The rules here are not ambiguous: operating first and asking questions later is not an option.
At the same time, licenses issued by BAPPEBTI before regulatory authority was transferred to OJK remain valid until the expiration dates specified in the original approvals. This continuity is managed through a formal transition period. During this phase, entities previously authorized under the commodity-based supervision model are required to confirm compliance with the new financial-sector standards now enforced by OJK.
This approach preserves legal continuity while gradually absorbing existing market participants into the updated supervisory framework. The transition mechanism also allows for the reissuance of existing licenses without altering the core business profile, provided that internal controls, compliance procedures, and operational policies are fully aligned with OJK’s current requirements. In effect, Indonesia has chosen evolution over disruption — but only for those willing to adapt.
Who Needs an Indonesian Crypto License: A Market Built on Roles, Not Shortcuts
Indonesia has drawn a clear line around its crypto market. Access is granted only to legal entities that have obtained official authorization to conduct blockchain-related activity in the country. Licensing is mandatory for every participant whose business involves the circulation, custody, execution, or technical support of digital financial assets. Size doesn’t matter here. Neither does business model. Without accredited status, offering or promoting crypto services in Indonesia is simply not permitted.
How Digital Asset Platforms Are Structured
Indonesia’s approach to digital financial assets relies on a tightly organized platform model. Each participant operates within a clearly defined function, all under the oversight of OJK, which supervises trading, settlement, storage, and risk controls across the crypto ecosystem.
At the operational core is the crypto exchange. This entity provides the technological framework and manages access to digital asset markets, coordinating trades and distribution of assets. In the current regulatory model, exchanges function as centralized operators and must undergo full crypto licensing in Indonesia under OJK supervision.
Transaction integrity is handled by a separate clearing entity. This layer ensures proper settlement, confirms execution, matches orders, and allocates obligations between counterparties. It provides the legal backbone that makes trades enforceable.
Asset protection falls to licensed custodians, responsible for safeguarding digital assets through security protocols, access controls, reserve management, and backup systems. These entities are audited for both technological resilience and legal compliance, with client asset protection as a primary objective.
Commercial execution is carried out by DFA dealers, who trade either on behalf of clients or for their own account. Their responsibilities include user identification, account administration, and monitoring the accuracy of transaction execution.
The framework also leaves space for new models — but only through controlled entry. Businesses can test their concepts within OJK’s regulatory sandbox, where compliance and operational soundness are evaluated before full authorization is granted.
The result is a modular crypto market where every participant must hold an Indonesian crypto license and operate strictly within a defined functional scope. Innovation is allowed — but only inside a regulated perimeter.
Obtaining an Indonesian Crypto License: Who Qualifies and on What Terms
Indonesia sets the bar high for companies planning to operate with digital financial assets. The law lays out precise entry conditions for legal entities seeking to obtain a license for crypto-related activity in Indonesia. These requirements go beyond formal incorporation and extend into financial substance — including paid-up capital thresholds and minimum net asset levels. The exact level of scrutiny depends on the applicant’s role in the ecosystem: exchange, clearing entity, custodial provider, or dealer. Below is a structured overview of the core eligibility criteria for crypto licensing in Indonesia.
|
Applicant Type |
Key Licensing Requirements |
|
Exchange |
Must be incorporated as a limited liability company and founded by at least 11 independent legal entities with a minimum of three years’ experience trading approved DFA. Minimum paid-up capital: IDR 1 trillion (approx. USD 584 million). To obtain an Indonesian crypto license, the exchange must maintain funding at no less than 80% of the paid-up capital. |
|
Clearing Organization |
Must operate as a limited liability company. Minimum paid-up capital: IDR 500 billion (approx. USD 42 million). The entity is required to maintain its own funds at no less than 80% of the contributed capital. |
|
Custodian |
Only limited liability companies are eligible. Minimum paid-up capital: IDR 250 billion (approx. USD 21 million). To register a crypto license in Indonesia, the custodian must hold net assets of at least 80% of this amount. |
|
Dealer |
Must be incorporated as a limited liability company. Minimum fully paid-up capital: IDR 100 billion (approx. USD 8 million). A mandatory condition for obtaining an Indonesian crypto license is maintaining own funds at or above 80% of the paid-up capital. |
These thresholds make one thing clear: crypto licensing in Indonesia is designed for well-capitalized, structurally sound operators. The framework favors institutions capable of sustaining financial resilience, internal controls, and long-term operational stability — not lightweight or experimental market entrants.
Which Digital Assets Get a Seat at the Table: Admission Rules for DFA Trading Platforms
The rules governing digital asset circulation on DFA platforms are deliberately selective. Only assets that meet a defined set of criteria are allowed into market trading. At the core of this framework is a technical requirement: a digital financial asset must be created, recorded, and transferred exclusively through distributed ledger technologies — including blockchain and other architectures built on decentralized data recording.
Just as important is what doesn’t qualify. A DFA must not exist within traditional banking ledgers or stock-market depository systems. This absence is not accidental — it is a defining feature that separates digital financial assets from electronic money, conventional financial instruments, or securities held in state-controlled depositories. In short, if an asset lives inside classic financial infrastructure, it does not belong on a DFA platform.
Beyond technical architecture, legal compatibility matters. A digital asset cannot be used in ways that conflict with existing regulation or applicable legal norms. This includes rules on financial stability, anti–money laundering controls, capital flow oversight, and consumer protection. Assets that introduce legal ambiguity or systemic risk simply do not pass the gate.
Additional admission parameters are set directly by OJK, which retains the authority to introduce special approval regimes for new categories of digital financial assets. These often emerge through technological shifts or structural changes in the market. This flexible control model allows the regulator to adjust access rules as innovation unfolds, without sacrificing oversight.
The result is a system designed to keep the market adaptable but disciplined. Innovation is not blocked — it is filtered. Only assets that align with both technological standards and regulatory expectations are allowed to circulate, preserving a balance between experimentation and the long-term stability of Indonesia’s digital asset infrastructure.
Walking the Regulatory Maze: How to Obtain a Crypto License in Indonesia
The process of securing a crypto license in Indonesia follows a strictly sequenced path, tightly aligned with the expectations of financial supervision. Every stage — from the initial submission to final registration — involves a legal and technical examination of the applicant’s corporate structure, financial footing, and operational backbone. The entire procedure unfolds under rules issued by OJK, and compliance is required not only in form, but in substance. Paperwork alone is never enough; the business itself is assessed for coherence, resilience, and regulatory fit.
Preparing the Documentation Package
At the preparatory stage, a legal entity seeking an Indonesian license for digital asset operations must assemble a comprehensive documentation package that reflects its legal standing, technical infrastructure, and long-term business logic. Each document plays a specific role in the regulatory review, and its content must align with the standards defined by OJK regulations. Particular attention is paid to consistency and completeness, as these materials form the basis for the regulator’s initial conclusion on whether the applicant may proceed further in the Indonesian crypto licensing process.
The package typically includes:
- Corporate incorporation documents — certified copies of the charter, registration certificates, details of shareholding, and capital structure.
- Identification of controlling persons — personal data of ultimate beneficial owners, board members, and senior executives.
- Technology architecture overview — a structured explanation of internal IT systems, including security protocols, data storage mechanisms, and protection against unauthorized access.
- Financial and operational model — a business plan demonstrating economic sustainability, projected revenue sources, and risk management mechanisms relevant to obtaining a crypto license in Indonesia.
- Compliance framework — internal policies designed to prevent illicit fund flows and the financing of prohibited activities.
- Technical team profiles — evidence of the qualifications and experience of specialists responsible for platform maintenance and operational stability.
Each of these elements is reviewed by authorized OJK specialists for accuracy, relevance, and alignment with the applicant’s organizational model. Only after this scrutiny does the regulator determine whether the company is eligible to move forward toward authorization for blockchain-based activity in Indonesia.
OJK Submission: Entering the Licensing Track
The Indonesian crypto licensing process formally begins with a digital filing through Sprint, the online system operated by OJK for regulated financial activities. This platform acts as a single access point for applicants in the DFA sector and automatically channels submissions into the regulator’s initial screening workflow.
Applications for an Indonesian crypto license are submitted exclusively online. The request must include the full documentation set prepared in line with OJK’s formal and technical standards. Once the file is lodged, the applicant receives a unique reference number that allows continuous tracking of the review status and triggers automated alerts if clarifications, amendments, or supplementary materials are required.
All actions within Sprint are validated using an electronic signature, granting legal force to the submitted information and removing the need for physical paperwork. If the application package is incomplete or fails to meet technical formatting requirements, it is rejected during the formal verification stage. In such cases, the licensing process cannot advance until all deficiencies are remedied.
Assessment of Security, Compliance, and Disclosure
After acceptance at the intake stage, OJK proceeds with a substantive review of the application. The regulator examines the applicant’s information security setup, data processing safeguards, and the stability of technical systems responsible for access control and operational continuity.
Alongside technical scrutiny, OJK evaluates corporate governance and compliance structures. This includes internal oversight mechanisms, compliance monitoring procedures, and predefined response protocols for suspicious or abnormal user behavior. Transparency is treated as a critical benchmark, covering disclosure practices, settlement processes, and consistency with financial reporting standards.
If any element of this regulatory framework is found to be deficient, the review is paused. The application for an Indonesian crypto license remains suspended until corrective measures are implemented and documented proof of compliance is submitted.
The Final Gate: How OJK Issues — or Refuses — a Crypto License
Once the regulatory review is complete and the applicant is found to fully meet the required standards, the process moves into its final administrative phase. This is where OJK delivers its verdict: approval of an Indonesian license to operate with virtual assets, or a formal refusal. The decision is not mechanical. It is based on a consolidated assessment of the applicant’s entire setup — financial resilience, corporate structure, technological maturity, and adherence to transparency and disclosure requirements.
The outcome is formalized through an official OJK resolution. This document specifies the legal grounds for the decision, the validity period of the license, and the exact scope of permitted activities. Upon successful registration, the Indonesian crypto license is entered into OJK’s centralized registry and becomes the legal foundation for launching operations within the jurisdiction as an accredited digital financial services provider.
Issuance of the license is accompanied by publication in OJK’s public register of approved entities. This public listing serves a practical purpose: it confirms the operator’s legal status and enables lawful interaction with Indonesia’s banking system, payment institutions, and broader financial infrastructure. At that point, the transition from applicant to regulated market participant is complete — not provisional, not symbolic, but fully enforceable in law.
Contact our experts and get answers to your questions.
The Fine Print of Licensing: Ongoing Scrutiny in the Indonesian Crypto Market
Indonesia’s crypto licensing process is highly formalized, but the real complexity begins after approval. Licensed operators enter an environment of constant regulatory engagement, where compliance is measured continuously rather than episodically. This reality is often underestimated by newcomers to the market.
Following the issuance of an Indonesian crypto license, companies are required to submit recurring reports in standardized formats and on fixed timelines. These reports cover essential operational indicators, including liquidity health, transaction volumes, client exposure, and the status of internal compliance mechanisms.
Any irregularity — missed submissions, data gaps, or unexplained fluctuations — can raise concerns about transparency. Regulators may respond by initiating targeted reviews or inspections. Technical interruptions in reporting systems are automatically flagged, reducing the possibility of unnoticed non-compliance.
The message is straightforward: in Indonesia, licensing is not the end of regulatory engagement. It is the start of a closely supervised operating life, where consistency and precision are non-negotiable.
Indonesia’s framework for combating illicit enrichment and terrorist financing sits at the very core of crypto regulation. OJK expects licensed operators to deploy working, verifiable systems for client identification, transaction monitoring, and immediate reporting of suspicious activity. This isn’t paperwork theater. A missing risk-management program, or a “check-the-box” AML setup, is treated as a systemic threat. The consequences are heavy: administrative fines, criminal exposure for responsible officers, suspension of operations, or outright revocation of the crypto license. In some cases, platforms are frozen mid-operation until regulators complete a full investigation.
Indonesia’s digital asset rulebook is still being written in real time. As a result, amendments and new requirements appear frequently — and not always with grace periods. Certain provisions come into force immediately, forcing companies to adjust internal procedures, reporting logic, and operational flows on the fly. Failure to implement new rules fast enough is still considered a violation, even when delays are objectively unavoidable. This environment makes continuous legal monitoring mandatory. After obtaining a crypto license in Indonesia, companies must be ready to redesign parts of their operating model with little notice.
All onshore settlements must be conducted exclusively in Indonesian rupiah. This creates structural friction with global crypto and payment infrastructures. Direct exchange of digital assets into foreign fiat currencies is prohibited; conversions must pass through intermediary steps with mandatory IDR settlement. Breaching currency rules is treated as a violation of monetary law and can trigger sanctions ranging from administrative penalties to shutdown of payment gateways. To keep operations stable, licensed platforms must integrate with locally approved payment intermediaries that operate fully within Indonesia’s currency regime.
Taken together, these factors form the real stress test of the Indonesian crypto market. Licensing opens the door — but staying inside requires constant vigilance, fast reflexes, and systems built for regulatory shockwaves.
Why an Indonesian Crypto License Is Worth the Effort: Strategic Advantages That Actually Matter
Obtaining authorization for a blockchain business in Indonesia is not just a compliance exercise. It unlocks a set of institutional and commercial advantages that are simply unavailable to unlicensed players. Being entered into the official register of digital financial platform operators brings formal recognition from regulators and creates a solid launchpad for long-term growth inside one of Southeast Asia’s fastest-expanding economies.
Indonesia is a demographic heavyweight. With a population exceeding 270 million and a deeply digitalized society, demand for crypto and fintech services continues to rise. An Indonesian crypto license allows companies to operate legally in a jurisdiction where appetite for digital financial products is real and growing. That means building scale openly, without workaround structures or legal gray zones.
Registering a crypto license in Indonesia significantly elevates how a company is perceived by the market. Retail users, corporate clients, venture funds, and financial institutions all view licensed operators as structurally safer counterparts. Regulatory approval signals that the platform’s infrastructure, governance, and processes have passed official scrutiny — a powerful trust multiplier in a risk-sensitive sector.
Holding an Indonesian crypto license makes it possible to run transparent marketing campaigns within the boundaries of the law. Licensed companies can advertise crypto services through public channels, digital platforms, and industry events without fear of enforcement actions for illegal financial promotion. This removes one of the biggest growth constraints faced by unlicensed operators and allows full access to the local audience.
Choosing to obtain a crypto license in Indonesia simplifies interaction with domestic banks, licensed payment providers, and settlement infrastructure. This integration is essential for compliant asset conversion, transaction processing, and adherence to currency controls. Licensed platforms enjoy prioritized access to financial services and can connect to state-approved verification and monitoring systems.
After securing a license to work with virtual assets in Indonesia, a company becomes part of a state-recognized digital ecosystem. Licensed operators are not just service providers — they can participate in regulatory dialogue, contribute to the development of security standards, and engage in consultations initiated by the regulator. This status shifts the company from a peripheral player to a structural component of the national crypto-financial framework, creating durable competitive advantages over time.
Obtaining an Indonesian Crypto License Without Leaving Weak Spots Behind
Indonesia rewards preparation and punishes shortcuts. That’s why our support for obtaining an Indonesian crypto license is built as a full-cycle process. We begin with an honest analysis of the applicant’s starting position, identify regulatory pressure points early, and then move step by step: internal documentation, AML/KYC architecture, operational restructuring, and technical validation. Only after the foundation is solid do we proceed to licensing and registration. The result is not just approval on paper, but a business that can survive continuous supervision and regulatory change after launch.
