Shareholder agreements in Hong Kong

Shareholder agreement in Hong Kong is the main corporate document that provides a detailed and transparent distribution of corporate freedoms and onuses among the participants of the firm upon its establishment and during its further functioning. This document is of crucial importance for regulating the relationship between shareholders, it establishes the ordinances of oversight, distribution of profits and losses, decisions on the withdrawal of sponsors from the firm or the liquidation of the firm in Hong Kong.

In the highly competitive mercantile environment of this jurisdiction, one of the leading ones for conducting international mercantile in Asia, the correct execution of the agreement between shareholders in Hong Kong and abidance with the terms of the undertaking helps to minimize corporate perils and protects the interests of all associates. This document agrees on mechanisms for the effective oversight of corporate conflicts, which improves corporate transparency. Drawing up a shareholder agreement in Hong Kong is an integral part of a successful and long-term mercantile strategy.

Given that Hong Kong is one of the leading commercial centers both regionally and internationally, the issue of drafting a shareholder agreement when registering a company in Hong Kong is relevant for large holdings and start-ups focused on protecting freedoms and reducing legit and fiscal perils. In order to draft a shareholder agreement in Hong Kong that will properly regulate all aspects of corporate governance and protect the interests of stakeholders, it is important to understand the key aspects linked with the sequence of drafting and executing shareholder undertakings, its functional role and significance in the corporate structure.

Also, the article centers on the legit differences between concluding a shareholders' agreement when registering a company in Hong Kong and drafting the articles of association. In particular, a financiers' undertaking is an informal document that governs private legit relations between financiers and may contain provisions that cannot be included in the articles of association, since the latter is a public document binding on all associates. Unlike the articles of association, a financiers' undertaking allows for flexible regulation of terms that do not necessarily have to be published, ascertaining greater confidentiality and protection of the aims of individual financiers.

Draft a Shareholders Agreement in Hong Kong to ascertain licit stability of a mercantile

Hong Kong is one of the leading and strategically important corporate hubs in the Asia-Pacific region, supplying openings for the registration of commercial organizations, attracting capital investment and creating multi-level international corporate structures. Hong Kong's economic and licit systems, characterized by a high level of corporate governance and licit stability, contribute to the growth of confidence among entrepreneurs and financiers, ascertaining their functioning in the criteria of predictable and transparent legislation. Such a licit regime not only minimizes the perils linked with the licit and pecuniary aspects of trading but also creates competitive advantages for organizations seeking to expand their schemes internationally.

In a highly competitive market, formalization of undertakings between financiers, from a legit point of view, is a necessary condition for the implementation of joint projects and the achievement of stability in business relations. Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong governs the distribution of onuses, prerogatives and responsibilities of the associates.

In any commercial organization that includes several co-owners or financiers, there is a considerable risk of disputes that may hinder the normal functioning of the enterprise. The reasons for such disputes may be varied and may concern not only issues of strategic development and corporate policy, but also personal contradictions regarding the distribution of powers or material aims of individual participants. In the context of corporate multilateralism, where each shareholder can make their own demands or propose different approaches to managing the firm, constructive resolution of disputes and contradictions becomes important for maintaining stability and effective business oversight.

One of the effective ways to prevent such conflicts is to develop a Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong. Such an undertaking allows you to establish procedures for resolving disputes in advance, which significantly reduces the risk of litigation and promotes a constructive approach to resolving issues that arise in the course of doing business. Also, the shareholder undertaking is an important tool that can serve as a basis for negotiations in the event that the associates cannot reach a consensus on important issues of corporate governance. It sets clear ordinances for the negotiation sequence, including criteria for mediation, arbitration or other methods of alternative dispute resolution.

Drawing up a shareholders agreement when registering a company in Hong Kong is of key importance already at the initial stage of business organization, since it provides licit certainty and prevents potential conflicts between financiers, regulating such aspects as company oversight, transfer of stakes, dispute resolution mechanisms, and other significant issues affecting the long-term sustainability of the business. The lack of proper formalization at this stage can lead to unjustified licit perils, which in turn will negatively affect the growth dynamics and reputation of the firm.

When expanding the scope of a firm's schemes, circumstances may arise in which one of the participants will seek to significantly change the strategic direction of the organization's development or exit the project, while the other participant, on the contrary, will be aimed at expanding into new markets and increasing its market share. In such situations, the key role is played by the presence of a licitly competent document, such as a shareholder agreement in Hong Kong, which, in turn, will help maintain partnership relations, supplying licit certainty and preventing conflicts of aim between the associates.

To draw up an agreement between shareholders in Hong Kong to minimize the risk of licit disputes, including such an undertaking allows for a significant reduction in costs linked with resolving such disputes. Also, this document may provide for mechanisms for resolving disputes, which will allow for a prompt response to changing criteria and making informed decisions that meet the aims of all participants in the firm, ascertaining the stability of its functioning in the criteria of a dynamic economy.

The ordinances for drafting shareholders' agreements in Hong Kong oblige them to include provisions regarding exit arrangements in the event of unforeseen events, such as changes in the economic or political situation, or circumstances beyond the control of the associates, which is an important element in ascertaining the sustainability and continuity of corporate schemes. Shareholder agreements in Hong Kong, unlike articles of association, allow for a detailed procedure for resolving potential disputes between financiers, considering various scenarios and making it possible to calculate and minimize the consequences of differences in the strategic views of the associates.

The drafting of a Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong involves the inclusion of provisions in its text that regulate the procedure for settling disputes that arise during the performance of the associates' onuses. In particular, it is advisable to provide for mediation and arbitration mechanisms that will ascertain effective resolution of conflict situations in the event of disputes between financiers.

The contract may contain detailed provisions establishing the sequence of actions of the associates in disputed situations, including the mandatory use of pre-trial procedures, such as mediation, in order to reach an amicable undertaking. In the event of the ineffectiveness of these procedures, the onus of the associates to refer the dispute to a competent arbitration body should be prescribed, and the contract should specify the place of arbitration, the ordinances under which the proceedings will be conducted, as well as the procedure for appointing arbitrators.

Also, the undertaking should provide clear criteria for determining whether a dispute has arisen, the time limits for mediation and arbitration, considering the application of international law and Hong Kong law. The terms concerning confidentiality and the binding nature of arbitration decisions should be set out in the undertaking.

Although a financiers' undertaking does not provide absolute guarantees of the complete elimination of the possibility of disputes among participants, it significantly minimizes the likelihood of their occurrence, thanks to the dispute resolution mechanisms provided therein, the establishment of clear onuses of the associates and the creation of licit instruments aimed at preventing potential conflict situations.

As a result, a competent execution of a shareholders' agreement when opening a company in Hong Kong helps to strengthen the stability of a licit entity, increases the level of corporate governance and ascertains long-term predictability, which is important in criteria of uncertainty and external instability. Drawing up a shareholders' agreement in Hong Kong will allow you to maintain harmonious mercantile relations, allowing you to maintain interaction even if there are disputes on issues of further development of the firm.

Key issues to be reflected in a shareholders undertaking

A shareholders' undertaking is a licit act that defines the structure of the relationship between the founders of the firm and financiers, as well as the mechanisms of corporate governance and protection of the property interests of the associates. In the case of an initial investment round, financiers usually require the conclusion of a shareholders' agreement in Hong Kong, since it establishes licit guarantees for the observance of their prerogatives, the criteria for participation in strategic oversight and the mechanism for exiting the mercantile. This document is an important factor in assessing the corporate stability and investment attractiveness of the firm. The main issues that should be included in the financiers' undertaking are described below.

                                        Representation or participation in the board of directors

One of the important aspects to be regulated when drafting a HK financiers’ undertaking is corporate governance. financiers may insist on securing their prerogative to representation on the board of directors in order to ascertain proper control over the strategic oversight of the firm. At the same time, the founders will seek to maintain a dominant influence in this corporate governance body, especially considering that attracting each subsequent investment round will entail an expansion of the board due to new participants, who, in turn, may lay claim to similar representation.

The founder of the firm, along with securing in the financiers' undertaking its exclusive prerogative to appoint and remove directors, must regulate with financiers the procedure for representation on the board, determining that the prerogative to delegate representatives to the board of directors is granted only to financiers owning a block of stakes exceeding a certain percentage. In the event that granting financiers the prerogative to participate in the oversight of the firm is not desirable, it is possible to consider granting them the status of observers. In this capacity, they will be able to receive information about meetings, attend them and make proposals, but their participation will not include the prerogative to vote.

                               Questions requiring unanimous consent (known as reserved questions)

In the oversight of a licit entity, financiers, also exercising their prerogative to representation on the board of directors, may impose additional requirements, including a condition that certain corporate decisions may only be made with the unanimous consent of all sponsors. These decisions, traditionally referred to as “reserved matters,” are subject to special regulation through a shareholders’ agreement when the firm is registered in Hong Kong and cannot be approved without this condition.

The issues subject to qualification as reserved include transactions with share capital, structural changes in the firm's capital, and amendments to its constituent documents. This mechanism provides financiers, including minority sponsors, with the opportunity to participate in making strategically significant corporate decisions that affect the firm's development. However, founders must exercise foresight and licit foresight when determining the list of reserved issues, since excessive expansion of its scope may lead to difficulties in the operational oversight of mercantile sequences or even to the actual granting of veto prerogatives to minority participants, which creates potential perils of corporate conflicts and abuse of prerogatives.

Restrictions on the transfer of stakes and the prerogative of first refusal

Among the key issues subject to detailed regulation when developing a shareholders' agreement when registering a company in Hong Kong, it is necessary to highlight the mechanisms for managing stakes. In particular, in the event of an expression of will by one of the financiers regarding the sale of his block of stakes, it becomes necessary to control the identification of the potential acquirer. Allowing competing persons or entities whose aims are contrary to the strategic goals of the firm to participate in the capital may entail negative consequences, which requires appropriate regulatory restrictions.

Founders must ascertain that the sponsors' undertaking contains licitly binding provisions governing the alienation of stakes, including a pre-emptive mechanism. Under this mechanism, a shareholder wishing to transfer his stakes to a third party must first grant the prerogative to acquire these stakes to other sponsors on similar terms. Only if there is no interest from the current sponsors, the selling shareholder is allowed to alienate the stakes in favor of a third party.

Mechanisms for resolving stalemate situations

Although it may be difficult to predict potential conflicts of interest between founders, financiers and other stakeholders, ignoring the risk of blocking oversight decisions can have serious licit and economic consequences. If such a conflict is not resolved in a timely manner, it may destabilize the firm's operations, in extreme circumstances, lead to the liquidation of the company in Hong Kong. To avoid such consequences, a detailed procedure for resolving corporate disputes should be included in the shareholders' agreement in Hong Kong.

To resolve corporate conflicts characterized by the impossibility of reaching undertaking between the associates, the following licit instruments can be introduced:

• Escalation of the dispute. In this case, the disputed issue is to be referred to senior oversight or the board of directors, which will ascertain that a final decision is made in accordance with internal corporate regulation.
• Assignment of the prerogative of decisive vote to the chairman. It is envisaged that the chairman of the meeting will be granted exclusive authority to make a final decision on issues that are in a state of stalemate.
• Fairest Sealed Bid. This mechanism assumes that sponsors submit their offers to buy out stakes to an independent expert or a third party authorized to make a decision. After analyzing the submitted bids, the fairest offer is determined, according to which the party that offered the least favorable criteria undertakes to alienate its share in favor of the winning party.

Drag and Drop Rights

When considering an exit strategy, it is important for a startup founder to include a put-back clause in the Hong Kong shareholders’ undertaking, which will allow all other sponsors to sell their stakes to a third party. Since the third party financier is often looking to acquire full control of the mercantile, a put-back clause provides the necessary flexibility in the exit, preventing minority sponsors from blocking the deal.

Is it mandatory to enter into a shareholders agreement when registering a business in Hong Kong?

In accordance with the current legislation, the mandatory conclusion of a shareholder agreement when registering a business in Hong Kong is not established. However, the issue of developing a shareholder undertaking remains relevant for entrepreneurs focused on long-term mercantile in the region. Despite the lack of strict legislative requirements, the Shareholder Agreement is often considered a fundamental oversight mechanism, especially when implementing innovative investment projects or operating schemes that require significant capital investment.

One of the primary steps in registering a company in Hong Kong is determining the form and structure of corporate ownership, since not only effective mercantile oversight but also its licit protection, pecuniary stability and investment attractiveness depend on this aspect. Due to the fact that Hong Kong provides for many organizational forms, including private limited companies (Private Limited Companies), public companies (Public Companies) and complex holding structures, drawing up Shareholder agreements in Hong Kong is of strategic importance.

The distribution of stakes between founders and financiers, which has a direct impact on corporate governance, strategic decision-making and future scaling of the firm, should be clearly spelled out in the sponsors' undertaking. Timely and competent conclusion of a Shareholders' Agreement in Hong Kong is an integral part of protecting the prerogatives and aims of mercantile owners. The absence of this undertaking can lead to conflicts between mercantile owners, to licit uncertainty in dispute resolution, which potentially threatens the stability and reputation of the firm. In this regard, the development of a detailed and licitly verified Shareholders' Undertaking is a preventive measure that allows minimizing corporate perils.

In order to draft a shareholders agreement in Hong Kong, also to the standard terms, it is necessary to include additional terms in the text of the undertaking. For example, if one of the stockholders expresses unwillingness or is unable to provide financing for the project by supplying additional funds or other property contributions, another distribution of the pecuniary burden between the co-owners must be possible without creating criteria that lead to destabilization or blocking of the firm's schemes.

In this regard, when developing a Shareholders' Agreement when establishing a company in Hong Kong, special attention must be paid to the detailed development of financing mechanisms, the prerogatives and onuses of the associates with respect to the provision of additional investments. The undertaking must provide for procedures for making decisions on raising capital, mechanisms for resolving disputes between stockholders in the event of a refusal or evasion of an individual participant from fulfilling his onuses, as well as a procedure for preventing situations that may lead to a corporate deadlock or a significant restriction of the firm's operating schemes.

Other additional terms include provisions governing tag-along and drag-along prerogatives, provisions concerning the distribution of intellectual property prerogatives, confidentiality onuses, and other key aspects. Integrating such terms into contractual relationships helps to build mutual trust and allows the associates to agree on strategically important issues in advance.

Involving specialized lawyers with expert knowledge of Hong Kong law is a necessary step. Specialized experts will help to licitly correctly draw up a Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong, considering, first of all, the scope of application, including questions of whether it will be limited to regulating exclusively internal relations within the firm, or will affect external onuses arising from joint partnership projects. Of key importance when drawing up an agreement between shareholders of a company in Hong Kong is the establishment of an arbitration or judicial procedure, during which the associates agree on the procedure for resolving disputes regarding the violation of the terms of the agreement between shareholders.

Want to consult?

Contact our experts and get answers to your questions.

Book a consultation

When must a shareholders agreement be concluded when setting up a business in Hong Kong?

At the stage of preliminary preparation of constituent documents for registration of a company in Hong Kong, it is recommended to conclude a shareholder undertaking between all interested associates. Concluding such an undertaking at the stage of launching a mercantile is most advisable, since before the state registration and commencement of commercial schemes, the associates have a greater degree of flexibility in agreeing on key provisions, including the procedure for distributing stakes, the mechanism for making strategic decisions, the criteria for leaving the stockholders and methods for resolving corporate disputes. It is important to conclude a Shareholder agreement in Hong Kong at this stage, since after the actual launch of the mercantile and the emergence of external market factors, it may be much more difficult to reach a consensus.

Given the high degree of licit complexity of these issues and the potential licit perils that may arise as a result of non-abidance of constituent documents with licit requirements, it is advisable to entrust the drafting of a shareholder agreement in Hong Kong to qualified lawyers who have competence in the field of Hong Kong corporate law and are able to provide competent support in drafting a Shareholder agreement in Hong Kong.

How to draft a shareholders agreement in Hong Kong?

The sequence of drafting a shareholders' agreement in Hong Kong is a multi-stage procedure, including detailed development of a set of licitly significant provisions, criteria and onuses, adapted to the specific intrigues and strategic priorities of the associates. Concluding a shareholders' agreement when registering a Hong Kong company is aimed at regulating the prerogatives and onuses of stockholders, ascertaining a corporate governance mechanism, protecting property intrigues and minimizing potential perils linked with participation in share capital.

Due to the high degree of licit complexity and the need to take into account local legislation, as well as international corporate standards, independently drafting and structuring a shareholders' agreement in Hong Kong without professional licit support may entail significant licit consequences. In particular, incorrect formulation of terms, lack of due licit certainty, conflicts of norms or their contradiction to current regulations may provoke the emergence of licit uncertainty, which may subsequently lead to corporate conflicts, lengthy litigation and pecuniary losses of the associates.

Thus, support in drafting a shareholder undertaking in Hong Kong is a necessary condition for ascertaining the licit purity and licit validity of the shareholder undertaking, preventing possible perils and ascertaining the stability of mercantile relations between the participants of the corporate structure. The procedure for drafting a Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong is explained below.

At the initial stage of developing a Shareholder Agreement when registering a company in Hong Kong, the composition of persons entitled to vote must be identified, considering their licit status and property intrigues. An important aspect of this sequence is establishing the presence of a dominant financier with a controlling stake, or a consortium of minority stockholders claiming to be granted special corporate preferences. At this stage, preliminary criteria are developed, additional mechanisms for ascertaining pecuniary security and protecting investment capital are developed, etc.

Once an undertaking has been reached on the basic principles, the sequence of preparing the initial draft of the document is initiated. At the same time, the terms of the Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong are checked for abidance with the current ordinances of procedural law. Given that each mercantile has its own characteristics, it is important to adapt the general provisions to the specifics of a particular project. In this regard, the terms of the Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong should include detailed provisions governing such key aspects as capital structure, corporate governance, the procedure for exercising voting prerogatives, mechanisms for protecting confidential information, restrictions on the transfer of stakes or stocks, the procedure for resolving disputes, and other provisions that are fundamental to ascertaining the stability and predictability of licit relations between the associates.

In general, the provisions that are mandatory when drafting and entering into a shareholders' agreement in HK include:

1. Regulation of the structure of ownership and transfer of stakes (detailed ordinances concerning restrictions on the circulation of stakes, pre-emptive prerogatives, prohibitions on alienation and mechanisms for leaving the shareholder group).
2. Corporate governance and decision-making procedures (establishing the competence of oversight bodies, establishing quorums, voting mechanisms, and procedures for resolving corporate disputes in Hong Kong).
3. Ascertaining protection for minority stockholders (mechanisms to prevent abuses by majority stockholders, including provisions on fair dealing and protection against unfair conduct).
4. Confidentiality and non-competition (establishing restrictions on the disclosure of corporate information, non-disclosure onuses and non-competition onuses on the part of stockholders).
5. Dispute resolution procedures (definition of mandatory pre-trial procedures, mediation mechanisms, arbitration clauses and choice of jurisdiction for dispute resolution).

After the preliminary draft of the Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong is prepared, this document is subject to licit audit. The purpose of due diligence of the Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong is a comprehensive check of its provisions abiding with the local corporate legislation and the legitimate intrigues of all associates who are its signatories. During the analysis, the completeness of the regulation of the prerogatives and onuses of stockholders, the mechanisms for resolving corporate disputes, the procedure for distributing profits, the protection of minority participants, and measures to prevent unfair actions by majority owners are assessed. Particular attention is paid to issues of abidance with antitrust ordinances, regulations on combating unfair competition and other industry requirements.

Based on the audit results, additional licit protection measures may be proposed, including the introduction of mechanisms for mandatory approval of key corporate decisions, the development of detailed provisions on the transfer of stakes, securing exclusive prerogatives and guarantees for the associates to the undertaking. This allows for minimizing uncertainties and licit perils, ascertaining maximum protection of stockholders' intrigues in accordance with the current regulatory environment in Hong Kong.

After the above stages are completed, the final version of the undertaking is approved. From the moment of signing, the document becomes licitly binding for all associates to whom it applies. Failure to comply or improper abidance with the instructions established by it may entail the application of civil, administrative or, in some cases, criminal liability measures, depending on the nature of the offense committed and the sanctions provided for by law.

Our firm's international abidance specialists can assist potential clients in drafting a Hong Kong shareholders' agreement.

It is advisable to obtain licit support and request legal assistance when concluding a Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong in order to comprehensively and in detail secure the terms of cooperation, prerogatives and onuses of the associates, as well as to minimize possible licit perils and uncertainties.

Shareholders' Agreement in Hong Kong as a tool for settling relations between financiers upon exit or change of control

The development of a shareholder agreement in Hong Kong involves the inclusion in its structure of provisions and instruments for protection in the event of the withdrawal of participants from the project or a change in control. The withdrawal of a shareholder from the firm may be due to many factors, including, but not limited to, a change in his personal and professional aspirations, the need to increase the liquidity of assets, the desire to redistribute capital into other investment instruments. Also, such a decision may be made in the event of significant changes in the foreign economic situation or in response to internal corporate conflicts that impede effective oversight and decision-making. In such circumstances, a shareholder may decide to partially or fully alienate his stakes, which may include both a voluntary sale of a share to other financiers or third parties, and an exit through the procedure for the repurchase of stakes by the firm.

In some cases, a shareholder may be forced to exit the mercantile due to debt or regulatory requirements. In light of the above, it becomes relevant to use licit mechanisms to protect the prerogatives of the associates, including onuses, restrictions and criteria for the exit of participants. The most effective and flexible tools for regulating these issues are developed at the stage of agreeing and signing Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong. This undertaking should provide for detailed provisions regarding the procedure for transferring stakes, exit criteria and dispute resolution mechanism, which minimizes perils for all participants and ascertains the effective functioning of the mercantile project in the face of possible changes in the composition of financiers.

Also to traditional provisions, it is important to provide specific mechanisms aimed at protecting the intrigues of all associates to the financiers' deal. The development of a shareholders' agreement when registering a firm in Hong Kong requires the analysis and implementation of a number of contractual mechanisms that have proven themselves to be effective in international licit practice and should be adapted to the specific circumstances of the associates. Among such mechanisms, the following can be distinguished:

• Forced Takeover Rights. This provision of the financiers' deal gives major financiers the prerogative to initiate a sale of the firm if they decide to sell their stake, and obliges minority financiers to join the transaction on the same terms. This provides liquidity for major financiers and minimizes perils for potential buyers who may not be intrigued in acquiring a stake without a guarantee of a controlling stake.
• Prerogatives of Accompaniment. This provision gives minority financiers the prerogative to sell their stakes on the same terms as major financiers in the event of their sale. This mechanism is intended to protect the interests of the minority, allowing them to avoid situations where they remain in the firm with a new owner with whom they do not agree.
• Prerogative of first refusal. This mechanism assumes that if a shareholder decides to sell his share, he must first offer it to other existing financiers on the same terms. Thus, third-party buyers cannot acquire the firm's stakes without the consent of current financiers, which ascertains control over the composition of participants.
• Non-compete clauses. Including non-compete clauses in a shareholder deal can limit the ability of financiers and key employees of a firm to participate in competing mercantiles for a specified period of time and in a specified geographic area. This helps protect the firm's commercial interests and prevents the leakage of mercantile secrets or technology.
• Lock-up provisions. These provisions restrict financiers' ability to sell their stakes for a set period of time. This restriction is intended to ascertain stability and long-term interests of all associates, while minimizing the risk of stakes being sold to the detriment of the firm and its reputation.

Integrating these mechanisms into the terms of a HK financiers' deal can significantly enhance the level of protection of participants' interests, reduce the perils of uncertainty and ascertain a balanced environment for all associates.

Failure to comply with the terms of the shareholders agreement in Hong Kong

In practice, situations often arise in which one of the associates may violate the ordinances established by the deal or refuse to fulfill certain criteria stipulated by the deal. In this context, the key role in ascertaining abidance with onuses and guarantees of proper fulfillment of criteria is played by the liability mechanisms and sanctions, detailed in the Shareholder Agreement. Such mechanisms serve not only as a tool for protecting the interests of the associates, but also allow for effective counteraction to possible violations, thereby preventing negative consequences that may arise in the event of non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of the terms of the deal.

When drafting a Shareholder Agreement during the process of registering a company in Hong Kong, it is necessary to include provisions regulating liability for non-abidance with onuses, such as penalties, compensation for losses, possible actions to enforce onuses (including lawful proceedings). Let us consider in more detail how liability for breach of the terms of a shareholders' agreement in Hong Kong can be implemented:

• Pecuniary sanctions and penalties that include the onus to pay certain amounts of money, stipulated by the financiers' deal or legislative acts, in the event of failure to comply with the terms of the deal, which compensates for potential losses to the other party and serves as a means of preventing violations.
• Compulsory buyout of stakes, provided for by call and put options, which gives the associates to the deal the freedom or onus to buy or sell the stakes (interests) of the violator, depending on the terms of the deal. This action may be provided in the event that the violator has failed to fulfill its onuses within the established period, which helps to restore justice and maintain the stability of the shareholder composition.
• Deprivation of voting freedoms or blocking of participation in the sequence of making key decisions of the firm, which can be envisaged as a measure of influence against the offender, limiting his ability to influence corporate decisions. Such a mechanism allows other financiers to protect their interests and prevent the adoption of decisions that may be harmful to the firm or other participants.
• Termination of the deal and exclusion of the defaulter from the membership, which may be provided as an extreme measure of liability for persistent or significant breach of the deal. This sequence involves the lawful procedure of termination of the shareholders' agreement in Hong Kong and exclusion of the defaulter from the membership.
• Lawsuits for damages, in which the associates injured by a breach of a deal have the right to apply to the court to claim compensation for damages caused by such breach. During the trial, the injured party may make claims for compensation for material and moral damages, as well as other expenses related to the breach of the deal.

Judicial and arbitration practice in Hong Kong shows that in most cases, shareholder deals concluded in this jurisdiction contain arbitration clauses, which provide the associates with the opportunity to resolve disputes that arise without resorting to lengthy and expensive litigation. This approach significantly increases the level of confidentiality and minimizes disclosure of information, which is important for protecting the commercial secrets of the associates to the deal. Also, arbitration proceedings are usually characterized by a higher degree of efficiency and flexibility of procedures, which allows the associates to reach a resolution of the conflict more quickly compared to traditional litigation.

How is a Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong different from a firm's articles of association?

The firm's charter is the main constituent document that describes the organizational structure of the firm, corporate governance mechanisms, distribution of rights and responsibilities of the executive bodies and the board of directors. This document is of a public nature and is subject to mandatory registration in accordance with the requirements of the law. At the same time, formal statutory provisions often do not cover the entire range of lawful and pecuniary nuances that arise in the course of interaction between financiers. Accordingly, the shareholder agreement (Shareholders' Agreement) in Hong Kong is widely used , detailing the regulation of lawful relations between the sponsors of the firm.

The charter, as a formal act, establishes the basic principles and is subject to disclosure to the registration authorities, while the sponsors' agreement, being confidential in nature, serves as an effective means of detailed regulation of such aspects as:

• mechanisms for resolving corporate conflicts;
• the procedure for the transfer and alienation of stakes (including provisions on pre-emptive freedoms, drag-along and tag-along);
• issues of company financing and profit distribution;
• restrictions on competition and shareholder exit procedures in Hong Kong;
• algorithms for making strategic decisions and ascertaining corporate control.

A properly structured Shareholder Agreement not only eliminates possible lawful gaps, but also reduces corporate perils by allowing mercantile participants to record individual agreements that, for various reasons, are inappropriate to include in the public charter.

The key task of mercantile entities and their consultants when developing a shareholder agreement in Hong Kong is to ascertain its legality and consistency with the provisions of the firm's constituent documents, in particular, its charter. When signing a shareholder agreement in Hong Kong, in order to avoid a legit conflict between the Shareholder Agreement and the Articles of Association, due attention should be paid to the correct delineation of the areas of their regulation. A shareholder agreement, as a rule, serves as an instrument for detailed regulation of the freedoms and onuses of sponsors, procedures for making key corporate decisions, as well as mechanisms for resolving disputes between mercantile participants. It should not contain provisions that may directly or indirectly contradict the mandatory provisions of the charter or legislation, as this may lead to its contestability or invalidity in court.

At the same time, the charter, as a constituent document, may be the subject of consideration by regulatory state bodies; it is available for review by third parties in cases stipulated by law. At the same time, the text of the sponsors' agreement is confidential and, as a rule, remains available exclusively to its associates, except for situations where disclosure of its contents is mandatory by virtue of an agreement between the associates.

Conclusion

Commercial practice clearly illustrates the importance of legal support for mercantile at all stages of its functioning, starting from the moment of company registration and ending with its operational schemes. In this context, the conclusion of a shareholder agreement when establishing a company in Hong Kong is a strategic instrument of corporate oversight that governs internal relations between participants.

This document not only defines the principles of interaction between the associates, their freedoms and onuses, but also serves as a guarantee of stability and predictability of mercantile operations in the long term. The Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong not only governs the current terms of cooperation, but also forms a unified concept of development and direction of its schemes among the firm participants, which contributes to the creation of a reliable and well-established corporate environment.

In the highly dynamic mercantile environment and possible changes in legislation, such a document is a strategic asset that allows minimizing the negative consequences of unforeseen circumstances, while ascertaining a balance of interests of all associates involved in corporate governance. Our team of experts can provide legit support and assistance in drafting a Shareholder Agreement in Hong Kong when starting a business.

Potential clients can contact us if they require full support in registering a company in Hong Kong, starting with choosing the optimal legit form, preparing and submitting all necessary documents to the relevant government agencies and ending with subsequent legit support in the course of trading.