This article unpacks the process of securing a crypto license in Latvia. We’ll walk through the key legal thresholds, registration stages, and strategic advantages, with special focus on how Latvia is integrating MiCA requirements into its national framework. We’ll also look at how different types of tokens are treated under the law, what obligations CASPs must meet, and how companies can reduce regulatory friction while scaling operations.
Clear out the essentials before we begin. Crypto-assets are digital currencies used for commerce and investing. Crypto service providers (CASPs) must register to trade, hold, or manage digital assets. MiCA, the EU Markets in Crypto-Assets law, governs monitoring and licensing. E-money, asset-referenced, and utility tokens have different transparency and reserve requirements, therefore business design must account for them.
The article is organized into several practical sections, covering Latvia’s legal environment, license types, documentation prep, ongoing regulatory duties, and the country’s appeal as a crypto investment destination. Each section offers tactical insights for navigating MiCA, reducing compliance risks, and scaling within an evolving regulatory landscape—whether you’re launching your first project or expanding a global crypto portfolio.
MiCA Regulation and EU Directives Create a Single Legal Framework
The European Union has stepped up its efforts to standardise how digital assets are handled. Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, also known as MiCA, is one of the most important parts of this legal framework. Understanding and following MiCA is now necessary for anyone in Latvia who wants to get a crypto licence or properly work in the virtual asset sector. This rule sets clear standards for the whole EU and has a direct effect on how each country's licensing process works, including how the Latvian government does things. To deal with the fact that the crypto economy has no borders, MiCA aims to create a strong and reliable system that lowers systemic risks and supports legal innovation.
Prior to MiCA, EU member states each maintained their own rules—or lacked them entirely—creating legal uncertainty and compliance obstacles for crypto businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions. The lack of shared terminology and inconsistent oversight practices made the environment unpredictable for both firms and regulators. Today, applying for a crypto license in Latvia requires companies to meet the harmonized standards that MiCA enforces across the bloc. The regulation’s main goals are to unify token disclosure requirements, regulate stablecoin issuance, and establish protective measures for retail users. In Latvia, this has led to legislative adjustments aimed at aligning national procedures with MiCA’s more structured expectations.
MiCA treats crypto-assets as digital items that hold value and can move across systems—whether you’re storing them, sending them, or trading them. This broad legal category forms the foundation for the classification of tokens and directly affects licensing outcomes in Latvia. Issuers of e-money tokens, for instance, are required to maintain fiat reserves equal to the total issuance volume, which brings their operations under enhanced regulatory review. Another key term is Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP), which refers to firms that offer exchange, wallet, or staking services. Latvian authorities require CASPs to submit an operational blueprint and demonstrate strong internal controls—particularly in the areas of AML and risk management—when applying for authorization.
MiCA divides crypto assets into three groups: utility tokens, asset-backed tokens, and digital currency equivalents. The rules that apply to each business are different, which has a direct effect on the licensing process in Latvia. Utility tokens that are utilised in self-contained ecosystems don't have to provide much information. On the other hand, asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, which are typically thought of as alternatives to regular money, have to follow tight rules for reserves, audits, and reporting. These requirements are particularly critical for licensing procedures in Latvia, especially for firms handling tokens with hybrid or evolving functionalities.
Despite its broad scope, MiCA does not regulate every type of digital asset. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) linked to art, collectibles, or other non-financial purposes remain outside its regulatory reach—unless their structure mirrors financial instruments. As a result, certain projects may qualify for crypto licensing in Latvia without full MiCA compliance. Central banks and public institutions are also exempt from MiCA, in line with their sovereign mandates. However, private sector firms must carefully assess their asset classifications. Errors at this stage can lead to rejected applications or fines. This is why legal expertise is strongly advised throughout the licensing process in Latvia.
Implementing MiCA in Latvia: National-Level Regulatory Response
Latvia has undergone a significant legal transformation to align its framework with MiCA, ensuring that crypto licensing within the country is now compatible with pan-European standards. Known for its forward-leaning approach to fintech, Latvia had to strike a careful balance between honoring EU obligations and maintaining its appeal to digital asset investors. The result was a series of amendments to the Financial Instruments Market Law and the introduction of tailored regulations governing Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs). These updates not only lay out the licensing process for crypto ventures in Latvia but also build a legal foundation for blockchain initiatives to operate within the country’s borders with full regulatory backing.
In 2024, the Latvian government updated its Financial Instruments Market Law to incorporate key MiCA principles, including disclosure duties, data retention policies, and user protection mandates. Businesses in Latvia that want to get a crypto licence must now submit a detailed white paper and follow strict rules to stop money laundering. Freedom Finance also helped make secondary laws that were especially made for CASPs. These laws set the rules for how exchanges, wallets, and stake sites can get licenses. The goal of these new legal tools is to make the review process easier while also setting a much higher standard for operating openness and compliance.
Primary supervisory duties have been assigned to Latvijas Banka (the Bank of Latvia), which now handles the licensing and regulatory vetting of CASPs. For a company to be authorized to operate in Latvia’s crypto space, it must pass a rigorous, multi-layered assessment by the central bank, covering everything from liquidity reserves to internal governance models. The Financial and Capital Market Commission (FKTK) complements this oversight by focusing on investor protection and fraud prevention. Successfully navigating this dual-agency oversight is a critical milestone for applicants—especially those offering services linked to high-risk instruments like stablecoins.
Latvia has set a clear calendar for full MiCA adoption. By June 30, 2025, all necessary national regulations must be in place to support crypto activity in line with the EU directive. This makes it imperative for companies seeking a license in Latvia to complete the registration process before these new rules officially take hold. Starting July 1, 2025, any digital asset operations in the country will be governed by MiCA—this includes mandatory EU-based data storage and restrictions on anonymous transactions. In practice, this means that securing a license in Latvia won’t just be about legal conformity; it could also offer a strategic advantage for businesses aiming to lead in an increasingly regulated digital asset economy.
How MiCA Classifies Digital Assets and Services in Latvia
The way crypto assets are categorized under MiCA has a direct impact on licensing requirements in Latvia. Each classification leads to specific obligations related to transparency, fund backing, and regulatory reporting. For businesses seeking authorization to operate in the country, getting this classification right from the beginning can determine how complex and resource-intensive their legal journey will be. This structure not only lays out the licensing path but also shapes how regulators will supervise each company after approval.
E-Money Tokens: Most Like Cash
To fall into this category, a token must maintain a stable value by being tied directly to a fiat currency and serve primarily as a payment method. Because they resemble digital equivalents of state-issued money, Latvian law places them under the most rigorous oversight. Issuers must guarantee full liquidity—backing every token in circulation with fiat held in regulated financial institutions. In practice, this means designing a solid liquidity strategy and presenting it to the Bank of Latvia as part of the licensing process.
Asset-Referenced Tokens: Heavily Regulated and Structurally Complex
These tokens derive their value from a basket of assets, which may include other cryptocurrencies, metals, or currencies. Because of their broader financial implications, they’re subject to much tighter controls. In Latvia, companies issuing this type of asset must hold a minimum equity of €2 million, ensure legal safeguards for token holders, and deliver detailed reports on reserve management. The licensing process involves showing binding agreements with liquidity partners and a comprehensive operational plan tailored to MiCA’s standards.
Utility Tokens: Lighter Rules with Certain Limits
Utility tokens are intended for use within a closed platform—for example, unlocking features or services. If a project stays small in scale, with fewer than 150 participants and annual turnover under €1 million, it may avoid full MiCA compliance. This means startups can benefit from a simpler licensing route in Latvia, provided they clearly document the token's role and its limited scope. But there’s a caveat: if the token’s purpose shifts toward investment or market speculation, the project will likely lose its exempt status and fall under stricter regulatory scrutiny.
Contact our experts and get answers to your questions.
Crypto Licensing and Service Scope in Latvia
Following the MiCA regulation, Latvia has established mandatory licensing for businesses handling crypto-assets. Whether running exchanges, wallets, or advisory platforms, companies must now obtain a CASP license. The licensing burden depends on the nature of the services, allowing firms to choose the license type that best fits their operations.
Regulated Activities: From Trading to Advisory
All core activities—trading, custody, and asset management—are now regulated. Exchange operators must prove technical robustness and liquidity capacity to the central bank. Fiat converters face strict AML scrutiny. Custodians must validate their encryption tools and recovery protocols. Even crypto advisors need a license if their input influences investment decisions.
CASP License Classes: Three Risk-Based Levels
Latvia offers three license categories under MiCA:
- Class 1: Covers order execution, staking, and token consulting (mainly for utility tokens). High-risk assets like stablecoins are excluded.
- Class 2: Allows custody and crypto-fiat exchange. Firms must verify capital reserves and meet enhanced requirements.
- Class 3: Grants full exchange rights and includes all services from Classes 1 and 2. Designed for high-volume platforms and broader investor outreach.
E-Money Token Issuers: Obligations and Oversight
Issuers of e-money tokens must be licensed as banks or e-money institutions. These tokens are treated like digital money and must be redeemable at face value. Issuers are required to publish a white paper and notify regulators in advance. If the token is classified as “significant,” additional rules apply: higher capital thresholds, liquidity frameworks, interoperability protocols, and EBA oversight with mandatory audits and disclosures under Annex III.
Companies already holding a basic license can apply to upgrade, provided they increase capital and prove ties with licensed financial entities. Moving to Class 3, for instance, requires at least €150,000 in capital and security measures like asset segregation and independent auditing.
Applicant Criteria: Legal Form and Compliance Checks
Only locally registered companies (e.g., SIA or UAB) with a real presence in Latvia can apply. Required capital ranges from €50,000 (Class 1) to €150,000 (Class 3), verified by a local bank. Directors and shareholders must pass fit and proper checks—demonstrating integrity, competence, and no criminal or regulatory violations. Though demanding, this process enhances the credibility of licensed entities and supports investor confidence.
Preparing for a Crypto License in Latvia: Documents and Key Procedures
Obtaining a crypto license in Latvia under MiCA requires extensive preparation. Companies must assemble a complete documentation package, strengthen their IT systems, and ensure key personnel meet regulatory expectations. Even small oversights can lead to delays or rejection, making it essential to align fully with both local and EU-wide standards—particularly in terms of data protection, risk control, and internal governance.
Document Collection and Operational Planning
The application begins with corporate documents such as the articles of incorporation, registration certificate, and the company's charter. In addition, a detailed business plan must demonstrate financial viability and incorporate MiCA-mandated reserve models for e-money and asset-referenced tokens. Operational policies are equally critical—especially AML/CFT protocols, data handling procedures, and a full risk assessment. Authorities also expect a comprehensive business continuity strategy to show that the company is prepared for emergencies or disruptions.
IT Requirements and Third-Party Security Audits
Applicants must prove their infrastructure meets high technical standards. A "security by design" approach must be embedded into the platform architecture from day one. Before approval, the company must undergo independent security audits, including penetration testing and code reviews, conducted by certified experts. Supporting documents should outline encryption protocols, data integrity safeguards, and other technical safeguards that ensure full compliance with MiCA’s confidentiality obligations.
Personnel and Compliance Competence
No license can be granted without a qualified team. Managers and major stakeholders must pass the standard fit & proper evaluation—demonstrating both clean legal records and prior experience in finance or compliance roles. The applicant must show it employs professionals in compliance, IT, and risk management, and has designated officers responsible for AML, cybersecurity, and financial oversight. Submitting resumes and proof of qualifications is mandatory to establish the team’s capacity to meet ongoing regulatory duties.
Regulator Engagement and Licensing Submission
Before submitting the application, it is advisable to consult the Latvian central bank or the FKTK to clarify any ambiguous requirements. When ready, companies must file their completed application through the CASP registry, including the full set of supporting documents and payment of the state fee. As MiCA mandates prior notification before operational launch, timely submission is essential. According to firms that have already secured crypto licenses in Latvia, transparency and early engagement with regulators significantly streamline the approval process.
Application and Review Process for a Crypto License in Latvia
Securing a crypto license in Latvia involves a multi-stage procedure governed by both the MiCA regulation and national supervisory standards. Companies aiming to operate legally in the digital asset sector must carefully prepare for every step of the application—from paying the necessary fees to navigating a structured regulatory review.
Before a company can begin operations, it must fulfill two financial obligations. The first is a one-time application fee, which covers the administrative costs associated with evaluating the submission. The second is an annual supervisory fee payable to the Latvian Financial and Capital Market Commission (FKTK) or the Bank of Latvia, depending on the business scope. These payments are mandated by Latvian law but are in line with MiCA’s requirement that regulators charge only reasonable and transparent fees. For new ventures applying for a basic CASP license, reduced rates may apply—though these concessions are limited in scope and tied to minimal-risk service classes.
The review begins with a preliminary document check, during which regulators verify the completeness of the submission. If any core materials—such as the AML policy, technical audit results, or business continuity plan—are missing, the applicant will be asked to provide the missing documentation within a specified timeframe. Once the file is complete, a more in-depth evaluation follows. This includes the assessment of IT infrastructure security, personnel qualifications, risk controls, and operational transparency.
At this point, the regulator may request further details or clarifications—particularly if the application involves higher-risk assets such as stablecoins or cross-border services. For companies offering wallet custody, exchange, or portfolio management, this stage is especially thorough and may include interviews with key personnel or independent technical audits. Once all checks are finalized and no deficiencies remain, the decision is formalized and the license status is published in the official CASP registry, granting the company full legal recognition.
While MiCA sets a benchmark of 60 calendar days for processing standard applications, Latvian authorities may extend this period to 90 days in cases involving complex service structures or incomplete files. In the event of a delay, the regulator is legally required to notify the applicant in writing and justify the extension. Companies planning to operate under Class 2 or Class 3 licenses are advised to build in extra time, as reviews often involve coordination between multiple supervisory bodies. Experienced applicants recommend submitting a fully documented file well in advance and maintaining regular communication with the authority to preempt any bottlenecks.
Essential Legal Obligations for CASPs in Latvia Under MiCA Titles III–V
When applying for a crypto license in Latvia, companies must strictly adhere to the legal standards set out in Titles III to V of the MiCA Regulation. These provisions define the required frameworks for internal governance, capital adequacy, reserve policies, compliance controls, and cybersecurity infrastructure. Latvian authorities have integrated these EU rules with domestic procedures, creating a transparent but demanding process that requires careful advance planning.
Corporate Governance: Structure and Responsibility Allocation
One of the first requirements for licensing is establishing a solid governance model. Latvian regulators expect applicant firms to show clear separation of roles across executive management, supervisory functions, and board oversight. This aligns with MiCA’s emphasis on leadership accountability and risk control. Shareholders holding 10% or more are subjected to background checks covering legal standing and financial competence. To receive approval, the governance setup must demonstrate independence, integrity, and an ability to manage risks transparently.
Capitalization Standards: Initial Capital and Financial Buffers
The minimum capital required to obtain a basic license in Latvia is €50,000. For firms seeking broader permissions, such as operating across multiple crypto services, the threshold increases to €150,000. MiCA outlines these amounts to ensure operational soundness. Operators deemed “significant” under MiCA—such as stablecoin issuers with over €4 billion in average circulation—must maintain extra reserves equaling 3% of their average monthly liabilities. These capital measures enhance system resilience but can present barriers to smaller entrants.
Reserve Requirements for Token Issuers: Storage Rules and Capital Backing
Crypto companies that issue e-money or asset-linked tokens must keep reserves that meet the following minimums:– €350,000 in equity;– 2% of their average reserve value over the prior six months (cumulative if issuing multiple tokens);– Or 25% of total fixed operating expenses.
If stress testing or asset management evaluations reveal vulnerabilities, regulators can impose a capital buffer increase of up to 40%.
Compliance and AML/CFT Protocols: Internal Control and Transaction Oversight
Every firm that applies for a crypto license in Latvia is required to operate a full AML/CFT and KYC framework. This includes client identity checks, transactional behavior monitoring, and the submission of suspicious activity reports. MiCA mandates that compliance systems be well-documented and consistently enforced. Latvian regulators will also assess whether the applicant uses automated tools for partner vetting and whether personnel are adequately trained in identifying and mitigating financial crime risks.
Cybersecurity and IT Infrastructure: Secure Operations and Technical Resilience
Information systems must comply with ISO 27001 or an equivalent framework. To meet the cybersecurity criteria under MiCA, Latvian law requires firms to conduct regular penetration testing, provide code security documentation, and apply robust encryption standards. Companies must also demonstrate that security features are embedded throughout the system’s design lifecycle—an approach known as security by design. These safeguards protect user data and ensure compliance while boosting institutional credibility.
Client Asset Protection and Ongoing Obligations for CASPs in Latvia
Once a crypto license has been granted in Latvia, licensed CASPs are required to maintain clear separation between client funds and their own operational assets. This segregation typically involves using dedicated wallets or accounts to hold customer crypto or fiat. Although MiCA does not explicitly mandate cyber insurance, both ESMA and EBA recommend securing policies to cover cyberattack-related losses. Having such insurance in place often streamlines communication with regulators, especially for firms managing substantial volumes of client capital.
Post-Licensing Requirements: Reporting, Audits, and Market Conduct
Obtaining regulatory approval is only the first step for crypto service providers. After being licensed, Latvian law—aligned with MiCA—imposes strict obligations on CASPs, including routine financial reporting, internal compliance checks, and mandatory transparency toward clients. These measures are designed to stabilize the crypto market and reinforce investor trust. Failure to meet these duties can lead to regulatory penalties or even revocation of the license.
All licensed crypto firms in Latvia must submit both quarterly and annual reports to the Bank of Latvia or the Financial and Capital Market Commission (FKTK). These reports cover critical metrics such as liquidity ratios, governance changes, and findings from external audits. Issuers of asset-referenced tokens must additionally provide detailed disclosures about the reserves backing those tokens—including composition, volume, and valuation. This documentation forms the basis for supervisory oversight and allows authorities to detect systemic risks in advance.
Licensed CASPs are expected to carry out regular internal reviews of their operational processes. These reviews must address compliance with AML/CFT rules, cybersecurity posture, and overall risk governance. MiCA explicitly calls for systems that identify, assess, and mitigate threats, including fraud attempts and cyber breaches. Latvian regulators also require documented evidence of each audit and expect companies to revise their internal policies accordingly to remain compliant.
Transparency is a fundamental component of regulatory compliance for CASPs in Latvia. Firms must publish up-to-date reserve data on their official websites—especially those issuing asset-referenced tokens—highlighting the breakdown and total value of assets held in reserve. Any material changes in issuance terms or business model must be reflected promptly in updated white papers. For utility tokens, issuers are required to inform users that access to goods or services could be disrupted if the project ceases operation. These disclosure duties foster user confidence and reduce the likelihood of legal disputes.
In the event of a security breach or operational disruption, Latvian-licensed CASPs must alert regulators and clients without delay. For example, if a platform suffers a cyberattack, the company must file a Security Incident Report (SIR) within 24 hours. Similarly, any significant change in corporate leadership or ownership structure—such as a transfer of more than 10% of company shares—must be reported immediately. These obligations are designed to protect investors and ensure the ongoing stability of Latvia’s crypto market. For that reason, holding a license in Latvia is not a one-time achievement but an ongoing responsibility.
Investment Perspective: Evaluating the Appeal of Obtaining a Crypto License in Latvia
Latvia is steadily positioning itself as a hub for crypto innovation in Eastern Europe, offering businesses a favorable route toward acquiring a crypto license. However, before initiating the process, it’s essential to assess the market landscape, weigh Latvia’s advantages against regional competitors, and examine both the opportunities and regulatory risks. This section explores whether securing a crypto license in Latvia is a strategically sound move, considering industry trends, tax structures, and evolving compliance challenges.
Latvia’s Crypto Sector: Market Trends and Strategic Positioning
In the period from 2024 to 2025, Latvia’s crypto market has shown consistent growth—trading volumes rose by 35%, and the number of active users surpassed 200,000. These results reflect the successful integration of MiCA regulations and proactive government support. Compared to Estonia or Lithuania, Latvia stands out with a more flexible tax environment and an efficient licensing process. While Lithuania often imposes strict additional guarantees—particularly for stablecoin issuers—Latvian authorities emphasize procedural transparency, which simplifies entry for new market players.
Latvia’s Advantages: Taxes, Stability, and EU Integration
One of Latvia’s key draws is its favorable tax regime. Although the corporate income tax is officially set at 20%, the base is adjusted by a 0.8 coefficient, effectively creating a 25% rate. Importantly, crypto exchange transactions are exempt from the 21% VAT. Moreover, major Latvian banks such as Swedbank and Luminor are open to working with licensed crypto firms, often facilitating account openings once the Bank of Latvia gives positive clearance. The use of the euro and proximity to core EU markets further enhance Latvia’s appeal for projects with European ambitions.
Cost and Return: From Initial Outlay to Long-Term Profitability
Launching a licensed crypto business in Latvia generally requires an initial investment of at least €50,000. This includes IT infrastructure setup, compliance staffing, and government fees. Operating costs vary based on business size—for instance, marketing may consume 15–20% of the budget, while liquidity management can take 10–15%. On the revenue side, exchange commissions may reach 0.5%, while custody services generate around 0.1% annually. For firms that diversify their offerings to include staking or DeFi tools, profitability may increase by up to 30%, shortening the payback period to 2–3 years.
Risks: Competition and Regulatory Shifts
With Latvia’s crypto licensing framework gaining traction, competition has intensified. As of now, 12 major CASPs operate locally, and five more applications are pending. New entrants must offer distinctive solutions to reduce marketing costs and stand out in a crowded market. Another emerging risk is regulatory tightening—future amendments to MiCA, particularly for asset-referenced token issuers, may impose stricter reserve requirements or capital constraints. Additionally, cybersecurity remains a significant cost center, with recommended spending increases of 10–15% to meet evolving threats.
Success Strategies: Niches and Strategic Partnerships
To improve approval odds and operational efficiency, companies should target specialized market segments—such as DeFi platforms for small enterprises or NFT custodial services. Product diversification is key to resilience: combining staking, consulting, and crypto exchange services reduces reliance on a single income stream. Partnerships with local banks or blockchain firms also streamline integration into Latvia’s crypto ecosystem. Collaborating with payment service providers, for example, may cut transaction fees by up to 20%, making the licensing process more cost-effective and scalable.
Conclusion
Crypto businesses who want clear rules and a smart way to get into the European market will find Latvia to be a great place to do business. In Latvia, getting a MiCA-compliant licence means meeting strict requirements about having enough cash, security, and following the rules. However, applicants who are well-prepared are rewarded with a stable and scalable base for growth. The country's membership in the eurozone and strong banking infrastructure make it a top choice for foreign CASPs that want to establish a long-term footprint in the EU.
To get a crypto licence in Latvia, businesses should focus on specific niches, give a range of products (like staking, escrow services, and DeFi solutions), and build strong relationships with people in the country. To meet the requirements of your supervisors, you need to be well-prepared with internal checks, IT systems that are compliant with ISO 27001, and a trained compliance team. A lot of approved companies have already said that Latvia's clear regulatory process cuts approval times by a lot, sometimes to as little as 90 days.
The adoption of MiCA has made investors more confident, and the local economy is still strong. This means that Latvia's crypto services sector is ready to keep growing. Still, people with licenses—especially those who issue tokens—should stay aware of possible changes in the rules and shifting supervisory goals.
If you want to get into one of the most exciting areas of fintech in Europe, our team can help you get a licence quickly and with confidence. Get in touch with us right away to make your crypto business fully legal and recognised by the EU.
Our telegram channel
