Virtual currency and crypto regulation in Switzerland

Virtual currency and crypto regulation in Switzerland takes a functional approach: a token's economic nature and the operations a company carries out set the legal regime. For companies and investors, this means checking early whether a project comes within FINMA requirements. The same check covers the AMLA and the Banking Act (BankA), FinSA and FinIA, and the infrastructure rules of FinMIA. A misclassification may lead a company to start operating without the required authorization. It may also bring restrictions on the handling of client assets and additional compliance requirements.

Applicable federal acts and FINMA's supervisory role

Virtual currency regulation in Switzerland has developed with no separate universal statute that would set one industry-wide authorization regime. Supervision is calibrated to the digital asset's economic function and to the mix of services each business offers. FINMA considers how the project is in fact organized and the route client funds take through it. It also scrutinizes custody arrangements and the character of the claims the structure gives rise to.

This functional approach is what defines crypto regulation in Switzerland. Using DLT does not by itself require a separate authorization. One set of rules governs currency exchange and another the custody of client assets. A project that issues tokenized securities may come within financial services legislation and the rules on market infrastructure.

In practice, Swiss crypto law is a combination of several federal acts, and each company's operations determine which of them apply.

Principal acts for crypto activity

The federal DLT package, fully in force since 2021, extended the body of law on digital assets. It brought ledger-based securities under a dedicated legal regime and created a special category of DLT trading facilities. FINMA regards such a facility as infrastructure through which ledger-based securities are traded multilaterally, provided the features laid down by statute are present.

One structure can fall under several of these acts at once. A payment service usually calls for AMLA analysis, whereas holding funds for clients engages BankA. Work with asset tokens brings a project within FinSA and FinIA, and CISA governs the collective management of assets. Under such a regime, the name of the product alone gives no reliable basis for classifying the project.

Swiss DLT regulation is currently in transition, and the analysis has to keep the regime in force apart from reforms that have not acquired legal effect at the date of review. The revised AMLA and a new federal regime for beneficial ownership transparency both enter into force on 1 October 2026. Draft rules creating new financial institution categories for payment instruments and crypto assets, however, remain part of a later stage of reform. At launch, the project needs an assessment under the rules then in force, with future changes written into its compliance plan for the following period.

How virtual currencies are classified: payment, utility and asset tokens

Any analysis under crypto regulation in Switzerland begins by classifying the token, since that step points to the relevant legislation. The technical label of the asset carries no weight in FINMA's assessment, which rests on the rights of the holder, the purpose behind the issue and the functions the instrument actually performs. A single digital object may serve payment, service and investment purposes at once.

FINMA distinguishes three main categories of token, while hybrids also occur in practice. The analysis below uses these groups:

• payment tokens are meant for making payments or transferring value;
• utility tokens make an application, a platform or any other digital service accessible to the holder;
• asset tokens represent debt claims, membership rights or other property rights;
• hybrid tokens mix features drawn from several categories.

Payment tokens are primarily an AMLA matter where a company, acting professionally, exchanges or transfers clients' assets or carries out other transactions with them. Even so, a payment purpose does not exclude BankA. Where the structure involves taking public deposits or the relevant form of collective custody of crypto assets, the banking regime is examined as well.

Digital form alone does not turn a utility token into a security. For utility treatment to hold, the access function has to be real at issuance, and the token must not also serve as an investment. If the buyer funds the project in expectation of a future return, the analysis moves beyond a pure service instrument.

An asset token may embody a debt claim or a profit participation right. It may equally represent a corporate right or a tokenized asset. Tokens of this kind engage the rules on financial instruments and financial services, together with those on trading infrastructure. Issuing such a token does not in itself amount to obtaining a DLT license, since the issuer's status and that of the venue are assessed separately.

For a hybrid project, the legal status of the token follows from all of its functions taken together. Stablecoins require separate analysis, because the holder's redemption right, together with the structure of the reserves, bears on the outcome, as do the obligations of the issuer. Classification takes place before the product is launched, since the contractual model shapes the later authorization and compliance procedures. Issuing tokens without prior classification exposes the project to the risk that several financial regimes will apply once the asset is already in circulation.

Setting up the company: legal form, capital and representation

Registering a crypto company is no substitute for the authorization that regulated financial activity requires. Incorporation confirms that the company exists, whereas entitlement to offer particular services derives from the AMLA, BankA, FinIA or FinMIA. The corporate forms most often used in this sector are the AG and the GmbH.

Which corporate form is chosen determines the capital the founders must commit. For an AG, CHF 100,000 is the lowest permissible share capital. At least 20% of it is paid in on incorporation, and the payment may not fall below CHF 50,000. The GmbH threshold is CHF 20,000, payable in full. Cryptocurrencies are absent from the list of currencies in which either form may denominate its capital.

The corporate steps run in a fixed sequence:

• choice of the legal form (AG, GmbH) and determination of the seat;
• payment of the cash capital into a special account;
• notarization of the constitutive documents;
• filing with the commercial register (Handelsregister);
• registration for tax and social insurance purposes, as applicable;
• separately, membership of an SRO or a FINMA authorization, should the chosen activity model require one.

The company acquires legal personality on entry in the Handelsregister. Local representation is also mandatory, since at least one person with authority to act for the entity must be resident in the country. In an AG that person is a board member or an executive officer (Direktor). For a GmbH, that role falls to a managing director or an executive officer.

A crypto company seeking regulated status faces a more thorough organizational review. FINMA examines its governance and the way internal control is organized, the allocation of powers and the risks involved. It also reviews the qualifications of senior management and the business it actually conducts on Swiss soil. For certain categories the law expressly requires both the registered office and the headquarters to be in the country.

The corporate process ends with the register entry, whereas financial operations begin once the sector-specific requirements have been met. Ahead of launch, the entity therefore has to be aligned with the crypto license in Switzerland it will eventually need. Financial market legislation adds requirements of its own, and these extend past capital, an address and a register entry.

Licensing crypto activity: SRO membership, FinTech and banking regimes

In market parlance the term "crypto license" corresponds to no legal category, since the sector has no single authorization. An exchange service falls under one legal regime and a custody model under another, while client deposits and banking business have separate regimes. FINMA starts from the project's actual function and only then settles which form of supervision applies.

For some intermediaries, what the market terms their crypto license in Switzerland amounts to joining a recognized SRO. This route serves professional financial intermediaries caught by the AMLA, including certain exchange and brokerage businesses, together with custody models. SRO membership places the intermediary under AML supervision, yet it confers no prudential authorization from FINMA.

Where a business accepts client assets, the FINMA license it needs depends on how the funds are held and used. Under Article 1b BankA, the FinTech ceiling for public deposits is CHF 100 million; the same license is available for crypto-based assets. Either way, the institution may neither invest the funds nor remunerate them with interest. In the bankruptcy of such an institution, client money does not benefit from the standard depositor privilege or from deposit insurance.

A FinTech institution must maintain capital equal to 3% of the relevant base and no less than CHF 300,000. Beyond capital, the entity needs an eligible corporate structure and a Swiss registered office, and it must conduct its business locally. Once the deposits taken are invested or bear interest, bank status applies.

Professional deposit-taking above CHF 100 million likewise moves a company into the banking regime. The capital floor for a bank is CHF 10 million; separate requirements govern liquidity and organization, together with management and risk control. FINMA expressly treats as banks those institutions whose deposits stay within CHF 100 million but are invested or earn interest.

The law prescribes no fixed processing period of several months before FINMA grants a crypto license. By FINMA's account, the length of the review varies with the model's complexity and the filing's completeness, and with the quality of the documents.

Want to consult?

Contact our experts and get answers to your questions.

Book a consultation

AML/KYC in crypto exchange and custody, with the Travel Rule

Virtual currency regulation in Switzerland imposes a distinct set of AMLA duties on professional financial intermediaries. Each intermediary verifies the identity of the contracting party and establishes the beneficial owner of the assets. It also clarifies the economic purpose of unusual transactions. Higher-risk relationships attract enhanced due diligence on both the client and the origin of the funds.

On the AML side, the business needs internal procedures and staff training, and it must monitor transactions and file the reports the law prescribes. The intermediary must keep client records current and set down in writing the criteria for its periodic reviews. Relationships with politically exposed persons, like other high-risk cases, are handled under enhanced measures.

The Swiss Travel Rule applies the requirements on originator and beneficiary information to transfers made on a distributed ledger. Where a transfer involves an external unhosted wallet and the technical system cannot transmit the required data, the regulated intermediary verifies that the address belongs to its own client. FINMA accepts documented methods of proving control over the wallet, including a check of the client's access to it.

Crypto regulation in Switzerland draws a line between providers that control the private keys and services with no access to user assets. For custody, the analysis covers who can dispose of the funds and whether segregation is possible in bankruptcy. In omnibus wallets, collective custody and staking arrangements, the question is whether each asset belongs to an identifiable individual client.

Swiss crypto exchange and stablecoin regulation

A trading platform's regulatory position depends on which assets it trades and how deals are concluded. Ordinary bilateral exchange of cryptocurrencies does not in itself amount to a DLT trading facility. The special FinMIA regime concerns multilateral trading in ledger-based securities.

A Swiss crypto exchange that also admits retail participants within the meaning of FinMIA, holds ledger-based securities in central custody or settles trades under uniform rules must be examined for DLT trading facility status. Only a Swiss-incorporated entity, whose registered office and headquarters are both in the country, may operate such infrastructure.

Smaller trading facilities can obtain a lighter version of the DLT license if they stay within these ceilings.

This model of license is reserved for infrastructure dealing in ledger-based securities. In March 2025, BX Digital AG became FINMA's first licensee of this kind. Its platform serves chiefly banks and other supervised participants, and it holds no DLT securities for clients.

Stablecoin regulation centres on what the holder can legally demand from the issuer. Where the holder is entitled to redemption at a fixed value, FINMA generally treats the corresponding obligation as a deposit under banking law. Issuing stablecoins also requires AMLA review and, for certain investment structures, scrutiny under CISA.

Trading in the tokens leaves that classification unchanged as long as the economic substance of the instrument stays the same. Some issuers rely on a default guarantee from a Swiss bank. Where the prescribed conditions are met, the issuer then needs no banking license of its own. FINMA requires the guarantee to give the holder a direct claim against the bank and to cover the relevant obligations. This protection is distinct from the deposit insurance scheme for bank deposits.

Crypto tax in Switzerland for companies and investors

Crypto is taxed at three levels of government, with federal taxes joined by cantonal and municipal ones. At federal level, an AG or a GmbH owes 8.5% of its net profit. These entities pay no federal capital tax, and capital tax is a cantonal levy.

No corporate rate valid nationwide yields the final tax burden on crypto. Cantonal and municipal rates and rules differ from one tax domicile to another. The kind of income a business earns also shapes its tax position, as do the design of the token and the particular transactions involved.

Key tax figures

For VAT purposes, the treatment of a token depends on its economic substance. Swapping a pure payment token for a state currency ranks as a dealing in means of payment. VAT on a utility token is assessed by the underlying service it gives access to. Asset tokens are judged by the financial claim they embody. VAT is charged at a standard 8.1%, and registration becomes compulsory for every business with relevant annual turnover at or above the general threshold of CHF 100,000.

Gains a crypto company realizes on crypto assets bear corporate tax under the ordinary rules for legal entities. Mining and staking rewards received by the company are recognized in its profit and loss account. The notion that every token is VAT-exempt does not hold, since the ESTV draws a line between payment and utility instruments, and classes asset tokens separately again.

For an individual, the nature of the activity determines crypto tax in Switzerland. Selling an asset out of private wealth produces, in principle, a private capital gain on which no tax is due. Professional trading, by contrast, brings the result into taxable income. For cantonal wealth tax, the holder declares cryptocurrencies at their value on the closing date of the tax period.

Withholding tax and issuance stamp duty raise separate questions for tokens. The 35% rate applies to relevant distributions, including dividend payments, though not automatically to every asset token. Contributions made on formation or on a capital increase generally escape issuance stamp duty until they reach a cumulative CHF 1 million. Above the applicable exemption, the rate is 1%.

The tax on mining and staking rewards depends on who receives them and on the activity in which they arise. A company includes such receipts in its taxable profit. Advance tax rulings serve complex issuance or investment structures, but obtaining one is not a required step in setting up every crypto company.

Conclusion

Virtual currency and crypto regulation in Switzerland rests on the classification of specific operations, and no single license is industry-wide. A project has to set the functions of its token against the AMLA or BankA, FinSA or FinIA, FinMIA or CISA before it launches. It also needs a suitable corporate structure and a check against FINMA requirements. A tax model covering federal taxation alongside cantonal and municipal levies has to be built in advance.