Registering a trademark in Indonesia is crucial for any company seeking to safeguard its uniqueness in the extensive Asian region. The polity's economy is actively developing, and many financiers are considering entering this market and expanding their operations there. In the modern world, intellectual property is becoming one of the most important strategic assets, and protecting a brand via registering a TM in Indonesia is a prime phase towards long-term success. In the absence of formal TM safeguarding, you may encounter illicit use of a name or logo, which ultimately leads to pecuniary losses and reputational risks. Licit practice shows that timely enrollment of rights to a brand significantly reduces the likelihood of litigation and negative consequences associated with unfair competition.
Why is it important for business?
The prime of IP for mercantiles is growing year by year. Any enterprise seeking to strengthen its position in the market must take care of safeguarding its name, logo and other identifiers. Registering a TM in Indonesia is not just a formal act, but a strategic tool that allows you to effectively safeguard your reputation and mercantile interests. Without proper safeguarding, mercantiles face the risk of copying elements of their corporate identity, which can lead to confusion among buyers and pecuniary losses.
The vast Indonesian market is multicultural and has many niches that are attractive to transnational investors. However, in addition to the prospective, there are also certain peculiarities of doing mercantile. One of them is the need to deeply understand the licit framework related to how to obtain TM rights in Indonesia and how to safeguard them in case of a dispute. There are many domestic factors - cultural, linguistic and licit subtleties - that influence how to approach the enrollment and management of IP.
For any mercantile that is already present or is planning to enter the polity market, it is important to have all the prime licit mechanisms for safeguarding. It is advisable to obtain a TM certificate in Indonesia before starting active marketing campaigns. This is important for expats, since in the absence of an official record, domestic firms can leverage the vacated niche and try to enroll a similar mark first. The licit priority that confirmation of TM enrollment supplies is the cornerstone in the event of litigation and dissensions in the field of IP.
Enrolling offers a powerful safeguard against potential pecuniary and reputational setbacks. For any mercantile, knowing the long-term benefits of official enrollment is mandatory. It not only aids in avoiding costly licit dissensions but also contributes to building lasting trust with the intended audience. Often, it proves useful to present the core merits of enrollment in a clear and accessible manner.
The distinctiveness of a brand is formally known and validated by a government authority. Possessing an official certificate enhances credibility in the eyes of both buyers and prospective mercantile collaborators. The licit safeguarding granted covers the entire polity and serves as a solid basis for enforcing prerogatives via the courts if prime.
Moreover, the brand gains added mercantile value, allowing it to be licensed or sold as a tangible asset. In summary, TM enlistment in the polity supplies mercantiles with a dependable licit framework, supporting sustainable growth and smooth cooperation with domestic partners.
Indonesian TM registration statutes
The regulation of IP rights in Indonesia is overseen by both domestic ordinance and transnational treaties to which the polity is a party. TM ordinance, in particular, is shaped by a fusion of national licit provisions and agreements concluded at the transnational level. At the core of the domestic licit framework is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, along with related ordinances such as Government Resolution No. 36 of 2018, which outlines the sequences for enlistment and associated sequences. Over time, the polity’s licit infrastructure has been progressively updated to align with transnational standards, although the polity continues to uphold certain licit peculiarities unique to its jurisdiction. For this reason, knowing the finer details of the national arrangement is mandatory when entering the Indonesian market.
TM enrollment in the polity is handled by the Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, DGIP, a government agency formed under Presidential Decree No. 44 of 2015. The DGIP is responsible for receiving and processing TM enrollments, maintaining the national TM register, and managing dissensions related to brand prerogatives. It also liaises with the judiciary when licit intervention is needed. The agency plays a crucial role in ensuring that the safeguarding of IP is balanced with the legitimate interests of enrollers, upholding both licit certainty and fair competition within the Indonesian arrangement.
The polity's membership in various transnational treaties designed to harmonise TM sequences and standards has made it considerably more accessible for transnational firms to enroll their TMs in the polity. Notably, the polity is a signatory to both the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol, which streamline the sequence of transnational TM enlistment. These transnational frameworks are fully aided by Indonesian ordinance, such as Law No. 20 of 2016 and its associated ordinances, which align with global standards while introducing localised needs specific to the Indonesian licit and mercantile sphere.
For mercantiles aiming to safeguard their TMs within the polity, strict adherence to national ordinance is mandatory. Law No. 20/2016 and its accompanying by-laws set out the procedural and formal criteria that must be met. The Indonesian system adopts unique ways concerning the assessment of enrollments, timelines for publication, and the prescribed format for record submission. Failure to understand or abide by these national specifics can lead to processing delays or even outright rejection of enrollments, potentially hindering market entry and affecting a company’s reputation.
Who can register a TM in Indonesia?
Among the primary obstacles that transnational firms face when aiming to expand into Southeast Asia, particularly the polity, lies in knowing who holds the licit authority to apply for TM safeguarding. The intricacies of TM enlistment in this region differ significantly from Western licit ways, needing a more nuanced and strategic approach. In the polity, both people and licit firms—whether local or transnational—are eligible to enroll TMs. However, while the ordinance is inclusive, transnational enrollers frequently encounter procedural hurdles that do not enroll to domestic firms, making the sequence more complex for transnational mercantiles.
For expat enrollers, the involvement of a locally accredited licit practitioner or patent attorney is not merely a recommendation but a practical necessity. This is largely due to language and licit needs. All enrollments and associated correspondence must be performed in Bahasa Indonesia, which adds a layer of difficulty for those unfamiliar with the language. Furthermore, a deep knowledge of Indonesian IP statutes is crucial, as any oversight or misstep during the enrollment sequence could lead to delays or outright rejection. To navigate these complexities, transnational entities commonly engage local licit representatives who are officially known and warranted to act on their behalf in IP matters.
Although establishing a subsidiary in the polity is not a licit prerequisite for TM enlistment, many transnational firms opt to do so. Having a local base can ease communication with local overseers, facilitate the licit sequence, and create opportunities for stronger integration within the Indonesian market. Nevertheless, the statute permits transnational firms to advance with TM enrollments without physically setting up a mercantile presence, provided all procedural needs are meticulously followed. While this offers a degree of flexibility, the absence of a domestic office may limit practical leverages that could otherwise streamline operations.
The enrollment sequence is overseen by a well-defined licit structure, overseen by the DGIP. This body outlines each phase of the enlistment sequence in detail. It is mandatory that all records are correctly arranged and conveyed according to these guidelines. Even minor administrative errors can result in delays or the rejection of an enrollment, underscoring the importance of thorough preparation and expert guidance from the outset.
Another common route for transnational mercantiles entering the polity's market is via partnerships with domestic firms. These collaborations often take the form of franchise agreements, licensing contracts, or other mercantile arrangements that allow transnational brands to establish a domestic presence without enrolling a separate licit entity. However, such agreements must be underpinned by a clear and mutual knowledge of IP prerogatives and onuses. Misunderstandings or licit oversights in this area can lead to dissensions, regulatory sanctions, or the forfeiture of TM prerogatives due to non-abidance with domestic licit standards.
It is prime to note that TM safeguarding in the polity is strictly territorial. This means that even if a TM is enlisted in other countries, it must be separately enlisted in the polity to be safeguarded under national statute. While transnational agreements such as the Madrid Protocol can facilitate the enrollment sequence for global firms, they do not replace the need to abide by domestic Indonesian statutes. Each enrollment must be tailored to meet national standards, which include both licit and linguistic considerations.
Moreover, Indonesian TM statute includes explicit criteria regarding what constitutes a valid TM. To qualify for enlistment, a TM must be distinctive and must not dispute any existing marks. Generic terms, deceptive imagery, or any mark deemed contrary to public order or morality is likely to be declined. Therefore, it is highly advisable to perform a preliminary TM search prior to conveying an enrollment. This phase aids to confirm the availability of the intended TM and reduces the peril of dispute with prior enlistments.
Given the procedural demands and prospective obstacles involved, especially for those unfamiliar with the Indonesian licit framework, obtaining early licit advice is highly recommended. Experts specialising in IP statute in the polity's can provide vital assistance, aiding enrollers to avoid common errors and ensuring that all needed records are accurately arranged and conveyed in a timely manner.
In conclusion, the polity does offer a licit avenue for both transnational and domestic entities to secure TM safeguarding. However, success in this endeavour depends heavily on a careful, well-informed approach. Whether via independent enlistment, strategic partnerships, or the formation of a domestic subsidiary, mercantiles must navigate a licit sphere that prioritises procedural accuracy, linguistic competence, and regulatory abidance. By engaging qualified licit expertise and thoroughly preparing each stage of the sequence, firms can assert that their brand is safeguarded and their mercantile interests are effectively safeguarded within the Indonesian market.
Contact our experts and get answers to your questions.
Enrollment sequence
In order to effectively formalize the safeguarding of unique symbols, it is advisable to consistently go via several stages. Otherwise, the risk of getting a refusal or facing a delay in terms boosts. Let's look at how to optimally enroll a TM in the polity, considering key licit needs.
The process of enrolling a trademark in Indonesia involves several mandatory phases, each of which plays a critical role in securing licit safeguarding for your brand. The first phase is conducting a preliminary assessment of the TM’s uniqueness. This stage is vital, as it aids in identifying any prospective dissensions with TMs that have already been enlisted. By doing so, enrollers can avoid costly and time-consuming rejections. If the proposed mark is too similar to an existing one, it could be grounds for the enrollment to be denied by the DGIP. Therefore, it is strongly advised to perform a thorough search of the existing TMs listed in the DGIP database. This can either be done independently or with the aid of a qualified domestic TM attorney who is well-versed in Indonesian IP statutes and sequences. In cases where a disputing or identical mark is discovered, it may be prime to revise the proposed design or brand name to assert its eligibility and hinder any licit complications.
Once this initial analysis confirms that the mark does not infringe upon existing prerogatives, the second phase involves formally conveying the enrollment along with the needed records. This phase needs particular attention to detail, as the submission must include properly filled-out forms, a clear representation of the TM, and a full translation of all supporting materials into Bahasa Indonesia. Also, enrollers must provide proof of remittance for the enrollment fee. The enrollment can be conveyed either online via the DGIP’s electronic portal or in person at their offices. Upon submission, a government official will verify the records for accuracy and assign the official date of receipt. It is crucial to assert that all data is correctly entered at this point because even minor inaccuracies can delay the enlistment sequence or cause the enrollment to be rejected altogether.
The third phase is the examination and publication period. After the enrollment has been formally received, it enters a comprehensive examination phase which typically includes three key stages: formal examination, substantive review, and publication. During the formal examination, the enlistment is checked for completeness and abidance with procedural needs. If it passes this stage, it moves on to a substantive examination, where the TM’s originality, legality, and distinctiveness are assessed in detail. If the mark is found to meet all the prime conditions, it is then published in the official government bulletin. This publication opens a window of time during which third parties may object to the enrollment if they believe it infringes on their existing prerogatives. This objection period is critical, as unresolved dissensions can significantly delay the enrollment sequence. Overall, the entire review and publication sequence usually spans between 12 and 18 months, provided there are no objections or licit obstacles along the way.
The final phase in the enrollment sequence is the issuance of the official TM certificate. Once the enlistment has successfully passed all previous stages without dispute, the TM is officially recorded in the national enroll, and a certificate of enrollment is granted to the enroller. This record confirms the exclusive licit prerogatives of the holder to use the trademark within Indonesia. With this certification, the TM proprietor is empowered to enforce their prerogatives, whether via licit proceedings or administrative measures, should any infringement occur. For individuals or mercantiles seeking to enroll a TM in the polity, adhering strictly to each phase of the sequence and ensuring abidance with all formalities is key to achieving successful enrollment. Once secured, the enlisted TM serves as a powerful tool for brand safeguarding, licit enforcement, and long-term mercantile development within the Indonesian market.
TM classification in Indonesia
One of the mandatory phases in the sequence of enrolling prerogatives to a brand is to determine the appropriate product category. Most countries use the Nice Classification, which is accepted at the transnational level. It is the basis for dividing marks into groups contingent on the types of items and services. In the polity, it is also customary to rely on these transnational standards, which simplifies the sequence for transnational firms. At the same time, registering a trademark in Indonesia needs to correctly fill out enlistment forms indicating the selected classes.
The Nice system includes 45 classes, 34 of which are for items and 11 for services. However, some jurisdictions may have supplemental clarifications or more detailed ordinances. The issue of determining the optimal set of classes should be worked out in advance, because the state fee is calculated taking into account their number. A certificate of prerogative to a TM in the polity allows you to safeguard the sign only in the declared categories. An erroneous or incomplete classification threatens to limit prerogatives, and an excessive number of classes boosts the cost of the sequence.
Many manufacturers and suppliers are seeking to expand their product range not only in retail but also in the service sector. This is reflected in the expanded choice of classes. The activity of prospective competitors in Southeast Asia is also high, which makes the prevention of TM infringement particularly relevant. At the same time, the correct definition of classes is the basis for future safeguarding, which underlies the protection of intellectual property in Indonesia.
When transnational financiers seek to enroll TMs transnationally, particularly in jurisdictions that adhere to the Nice Classification system, certain classes of items and services are frequently favoured due to their broad mercantile appeal and relevance across industries. Among the most commonly selected classes by transnational mercantile proprietors are Class 25, which pertains to clothing and footwear, and is especially popular among those involved in fashion, retail, or lifestyle branding. These items often carry significant brand value, making TM safeguarding essential.
Class 30 is also a popular choice, encompassing products such as coffee, tea, and various types of confectionery. Mercantiles engaged in the food and beverage industry, especially those marketing artisanal or gourmet products, often prioritise this class to safeguard their brand identity and build customer loyalty in an extensive market. Similarly, Class 35, which relates to advertising, mercantile management, and marketing services, holds prime for firms that focus on promotional activities, consultancy, or e-commerce platforms. Trademarking under this class allows service providers to distinguish themselves in the dynamic field of digital and offline marketing.
Also to mercantile services, Class 41 is regularly chosen by transnational investors and firms that are active in the fields of education, training, cultural programmes, and recreational services. Whether delivering online courses, hosting events, or offering skill-building workshops, firms in this domain benefit from robust safeguarding of their IP. Meanwhile, Class 42 covers a range of technical and scientific services, including data technology support, software development, and research and development activities. For mercantiles in innovation-driven sectors, securing prerogatives in this class aids shielding their technological advancements and digital products from prospective misuse.
Knowing the nuances of this classification arrangement is critical. Each class is associated with a specific set of items or services, and the licit prerogatives granted by TM enrollment are confined strictly to those specified categories. This means that if a mercantile only enrolls its TM in Class 25, for instance, it does not automatically obtain protection for similar marks used in Class 30 or Class 42. Hence, the strategic selection of classes aligned with the company’s actual or planned mercantile activities is not just a procedural necessity but a decisive factor in the strength and scope of the TM’s licit safeguarding.
Moreover, accurate class selection aids hinder unnecessary pecuniary burdens. Enrolling a TM in too many irrelevant classes could lead to excessive fees without delivering meaningful benefits, while neglecting a crucial class may expose the brand to risks such as infringement or imitation. Therefore, by identifying and enrolling in only the most relevant classes, financiers can optimize their IP portfolio, streamline enforcement sequences, and assert their TMs are safeguarded in the markets where they operate.
In summary, selecting appropriate TM classes is a foundational phase in safeguarding a brand on the global stage. Classes such as 25, 30, 35, 41, and 42 are frequently chosen by transnational mercantile proprietors due to their alignment with key industries. A sound knowledge of the classification arrangement not only facilitates informed decision-making but also enhances the value and effectiveness of the licit prerogatives acquired via TM enrollment.
TM needs: what can and cannot be enlisted?
When enrolling exclusive prerogatives to a brand, it is important to know which elements are permitted by statute and which are prohibited. Such data aids to avoid mistakes that can lead to the return of records or a formal refusal. Registration of a TM in Indonesia is not allowed if the designation is contrary to public interests, moral standards or misleads the consumer. Also, there are restrictions on the use of certain words and symbols, reflected in the polity's licit acts.
Those planning to promote a transnational brand should be especially attentive to language issues. Sometimes difficulties arise when registering a TM in a foreign language if the word has a negative connotation or undesirable associations. It is also important to consider possible similarities with already known domestic brands. Neglect of this risk often leads to state experts seeing a dispute with previously enlisted designations.
For financiers who want to prepare in advance and avoid mistakes, it is advisable to study the list of requirements for brand registration in Indonesia, as defined by national ordinance. Otherwise, errors may occur when filing an enrollment, requiring supplemental clarification or amendments. Licit specialists involved in assisting with TM enrollment in the polity usually describe in detail which design elements and vocabulary are undesirable.
Expertise and possible reasons for refusal when registering a TM in Indonesia
To successfully enroll, you need to pass a series of checks. State experts examine the records and the object of the enrollment for abidance with licit norms and the absence of dissensions with already enlisted marks. Before investing resources in a brand, it is important to understand the full extent of the responsibility: if contradictions with the needs are discovered at an early stage, this can result in a loss of time and money.
The answer to the question of what is needed to register a TM in Indonesia includes a set of measures: correct filing of the enrollment, abidance with language standards, confirmation of the legality of the use of design elements. The examination sequence goes via several stages, at each of which the overseers check different aspects of the enrollment. First, they formally consider the completeness of the package of records and the availability of prime remittances, and then move on to a substantive analysis, where they compare the designation with existing ones.
The main reasons for refusal to enroll a TM in the polity are related to identity or similarity to the point of confusion with existing TMs. Also, designations that offend morality, public interest or religious feelings are not allowed. If experts notice that the brand is capable of misleading buyers about the manufacturer, quality or origin of the items, a negative decision will follow. In some cases, the reason is non-abidance with technical rules, such as inaccuracies in the details or errors in classification.
When a notice of a negative verdict is received, there is a mechanism to safeguard the enroller's prerogatives. To overcome the refusal, you can provide supplemental records for registration of TM in Indonesia, make adjustments to the conveyed materials or send an objection to the examination decision. Sometimes the situation is saved by a detailed explanation of the essence of the mark, its originality and uniqueness. But if the appeal is unsuccessful, then judicial methods of safeguarding remain. In such circumstances, it is prime to consider the needs, with which it should have initially been agreed.
Contact our experts and get answers to your questions.
Terms and cost involved
Official fees needed consist of a basic fee and supplemental costs related to the number of classes, licit support, and translation of records. For one class, the government fee is usually around 1.8 million Indonesian rupiah (approximately $120), but the exact amounts may vary contingent on the current exchange rate and legislative updates. If we are talking about several classes, the rates boost proportionally. Also, foreign enrollers almost always need to provide for the fee of a domestic attorney or lawyer.
When a mercantile is looking to apply for trademark protection in Indonesia as quickly as possible, accelerated sequences are considered. In some cases, priority channels may be used, but this is not always the case and may need supplemental fees. Most expats prefer the standard route, which takes between one and one and a half years. With impeccable records and no objections from third parties, the time frame is sometimes reduced.
The exact timeframe for registering a trademark in Indonesia can only be estimated after analyzing specific circumstances, including the specifics of the designation and the number of classes. If the available records do not raise any doubts, the formal evaluation is fulfilled fairly quickly, and a substantive review is quickly launched. However, if objections arise or the enrollment needs to be revised, the time frame increases. The sequence can be partially controlled by carefully studying domestic ordinance and providing all data in advance.
Once you have successfully applied for TM registration in Indonesia and successfully passed the checks, you will be given a certificate. This official record confirms exclusive prerogatives to the designation in the relevant categories of items and aids. It is worth remembering that the classification of TMs in the polity affects the final costs: you have to pay for each supplemental class. In the future, regular maintenance of the brand status includes periodic renewal, which is described in the ordinances governing the sequence for extending a trademark in Indonesia.
International TM enrollment: Indonesia and Madrid System
The matter of international trademark protection is a key concern for mercantiles aiming to establish a broad geographic footprint. A frequent point of inquiry among such firms is whether it is possible to register a trademark (TM) in Indonesia via the Madrid System. The polity's’s accession to the Madrid Protocol has indeed streamlined the sequence of securing TM safeguarding across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously. This transnational framework enables firms to file a single enrollment, pay harmonised fees, and designate multiple member countries where TM safeguarding is sought. Despite this simplified sequence, it is crucial to recognise that membership in the Madrid Protocol does not override the polity’s national examination sequence. Enrollments are still subject to a thorough review by the domestic Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) to assert abidance with national statutes and ordinances.
The integration of the Madrid System presents a valuable opportunity for firms seeking rapid territorial expansion. It offers the benefit of administrative efficiency by reducing the need for separate national filings in each target market. For mercantiles operating across diverse regions, this arrangement can significantly lower the complexity and cost associated with transnational TM safeguarding. In the polity, utilising this arrangement permits firms to submit a unified enrollment that includes a request for TM safeguarding within the polity’s territory, among others. However, firms must also be aware of the limitations. The polity’s overseers retain the prerogative to reject an enrollment or request supplementary records if a conveyed TM dissensions with national ordinances or established licit norms.
It is also mandatory to understand that even when applying via the Madrid System, the formal trademark registration in Indonesia is granted by the DGIP. This means that, while transnational filing reduces bureaucratic burdens and facilitates easier management of a global TM portfolio, the final authority lies with the national office. In some scenarios, mercantiles may find it advantageous to adopt a hybrid approach—beginning with national filing to establish a domestic presence and later incorporating that enrollment into a broader transnational portfolio via the Madrid framework.
Transnational investors and financiers typically evaluate several routes contingent on their mercantile scale and long-term expansion plans. For those operating on a smaller scale or with a focus solely on the Indonesian market, conveying a national TM enrollment may suffice. For those seeking TM safeguarding across several markets, the Madrid System is a time-saving and cost-effective solution. In some cases, a mixed approach proves most effective, blending national and transnational strategies to suit market dynamics and mercantile goals.
Ultimately, choosing the appropriate method for TM registration in Indonesia involves careful consideration of several key factors: overall costs, expected processing times, the risk of refusal by overseers, and the administrative complexity of the enrollment sequence. To navigate these intricacies effectively, it is advisable to seek professional guidance from licit or IP experts familiar with Indonesian trademark statute and the operational sequences of both national and transnational enrollment arrangements. Such counsel can assert that mercantiles make informed decisions aligned with their mercantile ambitions and abidance onuses.
Monitoring and safeguarding of enlisted TMs
Having received a certificate for a brand, the proprietor must constantly monitor the market for unauthorized use of similar designations. Mechanisms for constant monitoring include tracking new enrollments in the state registry and analyzing the mercantile space. Careful monitoring allows you to identify violations in time to take countermeasures. This practice is relevant for any enterprise, because enrolling a TM in Indonesia is only the beginning of a long-term safeguarding sequence.
Also, situations arise when it is prime to use licit instruments to hinder copying. safeguarding an enrolled TM in the polity includes filing objections when similar new enrollments are detected and lawsuits against organizations that are actually exploiting someone else's brand. Domestic ordinance supplies for fines and other liability measures for violators. However, the effectiveness of these measures directly depends on competent support, so financiers often engage licit consultants.
If a company sees that someone is trying to apply for a TM in Indonesia using similar elements, it is important to react immediately. The DGIP arrangement allows for formal disagreement at the enrollment publication stage. In the event that an unscrupulous competitor has already started using a similar mark on the market, it is possible to go to court. A convincing evidence base plays a primary role here. With the right approach, it is possible to achieve the cessation of illicit use and compensation. Otherwise, you will have to put up with losses and lost profits.
Safeguarding a trademark in Indonesia transnationally involves not only ensuring that enrollment materials match actual use, but also engaging in licit battles if someone tries to copy the brand identity. Constant monitoring and a willingness to respond quickly are key to maintaining extensive leverage.
TM renewal and cancellation in the region
The licit framework supplies the proprietor with temporary protection for ten years from the date of approval of the enrollment. After this period, renewal is needed to maintain the brand's legitimacy. Trademark registration in Indonesia is completed with the issuance of a certificate, which specifies the validity period. If the company does not take any action after the specified period, the safeguarding ceases and the designation becomes vulnerable to new enrollers.
Renewal must be done in accordance with the domestic sequence. Renewal of a trademark in Indonesia is done by filing the appropriate form and paying official fees, and the renewal request must be conveyed no later than six months before the expiration date. Failure to do so may result in penalties or even the complete loss of freedoms to the brand, which may open the way for competitors and lead to reputational risks. It is important to keep track of all deadlines in a timely manner.
The mechanism of how to renew a TM registration in Indonesia is very similar to the initial filing: you need to submit an enrollment, pay a fee and confirm the relevance of use. If the company does not have evidence that the brand is actually functioning on the market, the registrar may request supplemental data. If there is no response from the proprietor, the freedom to the mark is cancelled. The validity period and renewal of TM in Indonesia form the contour of licit stability, but neglect of the sequence leads to the loss of this important asset.
A brand can also be cancelled at the initiative of third parties if it is proven that the brand has not been used for three consecutive years or that other violations have occurred. Also, certain needs for a trademark in Indonesia remain relevant even after enrollment. For example, if it becomes clear that the mark was obtained fraudulently, it can be declared invalid in court. And in order to maintain stable safeguarding, it is prime to monitor how TM protection sequences are organized in Indonesia and abide with domestic statutes.
When the established regulations concerning TM registration in Indonesia are not adhered to, several consequences may arise, potentially impacting the licit safeguarding of the mark. For instance, if a TM holder fails to renew their enrollment within the prescribed time frame, the TM will be automatically removed from the official register without further notice. In cases where the TM has not been used for a continuous period exceeding three years, it may be subject to early termination via a court ruling. Moreover, if it is determined that the TM proprietor has breached applicable licit provisions, this could lead to a formal hurdle and the eventual cancellation of the TM. In the event of such complications, it is mandatory to seek the assistance of qualified experts without delay. Expert licit guidance is not only beneficial during the initial enrollment sequence but is equally vital for ongoing abidance and timely renewals, thereby safeguarding the validity and safeguarding of the TM in the polity over the long term.
Conclusion
Modern mercantile realities dictate the need for a comprehensive strategy that considers all aspects of IP safeguarding. TM registration in Indonesia is becoming a key element for firms seeking to feel confident in the domestic market. Our consulting company offers a full range of services - from preliminary verification of the uniqueness of the brand to assistance in obtaining a certificate, as well as support in interaction with government agencies and courts. Professional support allows you to avoid refusal when enlisting a brand in the polity and optimize the terms of consideration of the enrollment as much as possible.
Knowing the sequence for filing an enrollment for enrollment of a TM in this jurisdiction, we undertake the preparation of all prime records, their translation into the state language, as well as licit representation of the client's interests. If prime, we will organize the registration of a TM in Indonesia, taking into account the individual characteristics of the project and the licit sphere. Thanks to many years of practice, our specialists develop an individual strategy that considers the specifics of a particular economic sector and growth prospects. A competent approach and constant interaction with official bodies aid to overcome formal barriers and assert long-term safeguarding of the brand in the dynamic market of Southeast Asia.
Our telegram channel
