Acquiring a payment system licence in El Salvador is a significant move for digital enterprises seeking to expand in a jurisdiction where both fintech and cryptocurrency are officially acknowledged under national law. The polity has become globally recognised as the first country to grant digital currency, particularly Bitcoin, the same licit status as traditional money. This legislative shift has fostered a mercantile-friendly climate, especially for fintechs, positioning the country as a progressive hub for electronic remittances and digital finance.
The government’s pro-digitalisation stance, along with streamlined mercantile enlistment sequences, has made the sequence of obtaining a remittance system licence more accessible. These favourable conditions have encouraged investors and fintech entrepreneurs to consider the polity as a base for both local and cross-border pecuniary aids.
To facilitate this growth, the country has developed a licit framework that supports remittance systems, encouraging foreign companies and private operators to apply for licensing. Flexible supervisory conditions, licit use of cryptocurrencies, and government backing for fintech platforms contribute to the polity’s appeal. However, applicants must be prepared to meet supervisory expectations, including abidance sequences, technical norms, and pecuniary oversight. Therefore, a solid grasp of the supervisory landscape and local mercantile conditions is essential for navigating the licensing sequence.
This analysis aims to present a thorough examination of the key steps involved in acquiring a payment system licence in El Salvador. It explores the relevant licit needs, outlines the functions of central overseers, and highlights potential perils and advantages. The content also includes a detailed enlistment guide, along with practical advice on managing records and setting up a licit entity. This information is particularly valuable for entrepreneurs looking to establish a payment service in El Salvador, as well as for licit experts, investors, and fintech innovators interested in entering the Latin American market.
With El Salvador and Fintech: Legal and economic setup for commencing remittance solutions
Before embarking on the practical steps needed to obtain a payment system licence in El Salvador, it is vital to first gain a solid understanding of the country's economic landscape and supervisory framework. These two aspects form the foundation upon which any remittance platform must be established, directly influencing the licit structure and operational dynamics of such ventures.
El Salvador, though modest in size and located along the Pacific coast, shares borders with Guatemala and Honduras, providing strategic connectivity to the wider Central American region. Despite its geographical limitations, the nation is emerging as a dynamic player in the pecuniary technology sector. Its economy is driven by open market policies, with a strong emphasis on foreign direct investment and trade liberalisation. In recent years, the Salvadoran government has adopted a proactive stance in advancing the digitalisation of its pecuniary aids sector, aiming to position the country as a key entry point for mercantiles looking to expand across Latin America.
Among the transformative developments in El Salvador’s financial legislation is the enactment of the Bitcoin Law. This pioneering licit measure has given Bitcoin the same licit tender status as the US dollar, making it a valid medium for both everyday use and official deals, including excise remittances. The introduction of this law has laid the groundwork for innovative fintechs, encouraging the creation and expansion of digital remittance platforms. The forward-thinking nature of this supervisory approach offers fertile ground for new pecuniary solutions and presents a compelling reason for seeking a remittance system licence in the jurisdiction.
Interest in establishing payment systems in El Salvador is growing steadily among both local mercantile owners and international investors. The licit provisions in place support the licensing of a wide range of aids, from conventional money transfer systems to those based on blockchain technology. This inclusive and progressive framework makes it possible to serve both private consumers and corporate clients effectively.
Possessing a payment system licence in El Salvador supplies formal recognition and licit authority to operate within the pecuniary aids sector. The warrant is granted by the country’s designated supervisory body and permits the warrant holder to offer aid both domestically and internationally. The polity has steadily built a reputation as a fintech-friendly jurisdiction, appreciated for its adherence to global norms of transparency, supervisory abidance, and fiscal responsibility. As such, it presents a robust and forward-looking sphere for launching or expanding remittance system operations.
Business opportunities
Setting up a payment platform in El Salvador offers entrepreneurs more than just licit safeguards—it also unlocks a range of strategic advantages for expanding into new markets. The country’s licit sphere is marked by clear supervisory norms, a favourable excise regime, and official endorsement of digital assets, all of which facilitate the licensing sequence for remittance systems and support cost-effective business expansion across Latin America.
Foreign investment is fully welcomed, with no limitations on overseas ownership of capital. International mercantiles can easily establish subsidiaries and engage in remittance processing operations. Furthermore, entrepreneurs may benefit from opening a service centre within one of El Salvador’s free economic zones, where significant excise exemptions—including those applicable to remittance systems—can be enjoyed for up to 15 years.
Legal framework for payment services in El Salvador
In the polity, the licit framework regulating electronic transfers is spread across various legislative instruments. These laws collectively underpin the authorisation sequence for obtaining a warrant to operate a remittance system and for providing pecuniary services within the country. Each directive plays a distinct role in setting the norms and needs for both traditional and digital pecuniary operations.
- One of the primary licit instruments is the Banking Law (Ley de Bancos). This statute outlines the core principles that govern the schemes of pecuniary institutions, extending its scope to non-banking service providers where they manage or interact with monetary flows and customer deposits. In the context of licensing a remittance system, this law serves as a benchmark for evaluating an applicant’s pecuniary soundness, corporate governance, capital adequacy, and peril oversight strategies. It is particularly relevant when assessing the long-term viability and structural resilience of a mercantile model.
- Another essential supervisory source is NASF-07 — Standards for Fintech Service Providers, which specifically addresses pecuniary services built on digital platforms. This standard outlines the enlistment sequence for remittance systems that rely on innovative technologies such as APIs, e-wallets, and smart contracts. It also sets forth stringent technical and abidance needs that service providers must meet. Furthermore, it details operational protocols for engaging with third-party data providers, cloud infrastructure, and external IT systems, ensuring a secure and transparent ecosystem for digital deals.
- For entities that operate outside the traditional banking framework, NRP-30 — Licensing of Non-Banking Organisations is the principal directive. It lays down the procedural and substantive needs for acquiring a remittance services warrant. This includes stipulations regarding the base capital threshold, the implementation of robust internal control mechanisms, a clear outline of the firm’s mercantile model, and provisions for the orderly closure of operations. NRP-30 effectively governs the entire operational life cycle of a non-banking remittance provider, from inception to potential dissolution.
- A particularly transformative element of the polity’s licit landscape is the Bitcoin Law (Ley Bitcoin), enacted in 2021. This law grants Bitcoin the status of licit tender, placing it on equal footing with the US dollar. It empowers individuals and mercantiles to conduct deals using Bitcoin without needing supplementary authorisation. For remittance system operators, this introduces an entirely new dimension of service offerings. The integration of cryptocurrency into the official pecuniary framework has direct implications for licensing, particularly in shaping the technological and abidance architecture of institutions seeking a Payment Institution (PI) licence in El Salvador.
Together, these licit provisions form a comprehensive structure that facilitates innovation while maintaining supervisory oversight, enabling a secure and adaptive pecuniary services sphere in the polity.
Supervisory authorities
The polity operates under a layered supervisory framework that oversees the licensing and supervision of its remittance system. This system is structured in such a way that each supervisory body has a distinct and independent function, ensuring thorough oversight of all remittance-related schemes. Collectively, these overseers are responsible for scrutinising applications, conducting supervisory monitoring, ensuring abidance with licit norms, and granting operational permissions.
- The Superintendencia del Sistema Financiero (SSF) serves as the principal supervisory body for licensing non-banking pecuniary institutions, including fintech firms and remittance service providers. Any entity seeking to operate a payment system in El Salvador must apply through the SSF. This authority undertakes an extensive review sequence, which includes pecuniary and licit due diligence, examining the origin of capital, corporate ownership, governance structures, and internal abidance sequences. Beyond initial approval, the SSF is also tasked with ongoing regulatory supervision, reviewing audit reports, checking adherence to statutory needs, and imposing penalties in cases of non-abidance.
- The Banco Central de Reserva (BCR) has a specialised role, overseeing entities dealing exclusively with Bitcoin. It grants Bitcoin Service Provider (BSP) warrants and establishes supervisory norms for areas such as reserve needs, capital thresholds, currency exchange schemes, and the use of digital assets. If a mercantile model includes cryptocurrency dealings, cross-border transfers, or unconventional remittance mechanisms, BCR approval may be needed for specific components. Furthermore, the BCR monitors the overall integrity of the pecuniary system and holds the authority to halt deals that pose systemic perils.
- The Comisión Nacional de Activos Digitales (CNAD), or the National Commission for Digital Assets, is responsible for issuing warrants to companies engaged with digital assets other than Bitcoin. These Digital Asset Service Provider (DASP) warrants are governed by the Digital Asset Issuance Act (LEAD), enacted in 2023. This law supplies a licit foundation for the directive of digital asset markets and sets out the operational framework within which these mercantiles must function.
- Lastly, the Unidad de Investigación Financiera (UIF), or Financial Intelligence Unit, plays a critical role in combating pecuniary crime. This authority evaluates AML and KYC sequences of warrant applicants. If a firm fails to meet the established AML/KYC norms, the UIF may either reject the application or revoke the warrant, as part of its mission to prevent the misuse of pecuniary services for illicit schemes.
Requisites for obtaining a license
When examining the licit framework governing payment institutions in El Salvador, it is essential to explore the fundamental conditions for acquiring a Payment Institution (PI) warrant. Applicants must fulfil a stringent set of licit, operational, and technical needs that encompass the firm’s corporate structure, staffing, technological systems, and internal abidance frameworks. These prerequisites are rigorously scrutinised by the supervisory overseers before a warrant is granted.
The amount of paid-in capital needed is largely determined by the mercantile model and the anticipated volume of deals. For non-banking pecuniary service providers, the Superintendencia del Sistema Financiero (SSF) establishes this capital threshold on a case-by-case basis. In most instances, it starts from approximately USD 50,000. The capital must be deposited in a dedicated corporate account within a national pecuniary institution and serves as a pecuniary safeguard to ensure the firm's operational stability. The origin of these funds must be fully traceable and supported by records, which forms a critical part of the licensing review.
Regardless of whether the services are intended solely for domestic clients or international markets, the applicant must establish a locally registered firm. Although foreign individuals or entities may act as founders, the mercantile itself must be incorporated in the polity. The firm is also needed to appoint a local representative who will act as the liaison with supervisory bodies. Incorporation involves conveying the mandatory constitutional records and opening a local bank account.
Key roles within the organisation—such as managing director, pecuniary officer, and abidance specialist—must be filled by qualified professionals. These individuals are expected to have demonstrable experience in remittance systems, a sound understanding of KYC sequences, and familiarity with international pecuniary directives. Overseers conduct comprehensive background checks on these individuals to verify their professional integrity, competence, and absence of any supervisory breaches.
Beyond ensuring functional efficiency, the platform’s security mechanisms are subject to detailed inspection. Applicants must provide technical records outlining their IT framework, including server architecture, data encryption methods, backup solutions, and access control systems. A robust multi-factor authentication sequence, protection against cyber threats, and secure key oversight are essential. The regulator also evaluates the safety of data transmission channels, particularly those handling clients’ personal and remittance information.
The supervisory body places significant emphasis on the existence of robust measures to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The internal policy must detail sequences for user identification, verification of the origin of funds, transaction monitoring, and the ability to flag or block suspicious schemes. This record must align with international norms, including the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and is submitted as part of the application dossier.
Contact our experts and get answers to your questions.
Phases for licensing
The licensing process for payment services in El Salvador is structured around a phased, sequential approach. Each stage involves the fulfilment of specific licit and procedural needs, along with approvals from relevant government overseers. If all criteria are satisfied correctly at the outset, the sequence can be significantly streamlined.
A firm must be enrolled locally before it can be eligible to apply for a remittance services warrant. The preferred corporate structure is a limited liability company (LLC), which may be founded by a foreign national. The firm’s articles of association must outline its pecuniary service schemes, and a physical office address within the polity is mandatory—virtual addresses are not acceptable. At this point, the corporate ownership structure is determined, and people authorised to sign on behalf of the firm are designated. All this information is formally recorded in the national register of licit entities. Once enlistment is fulfilled, the firm is deemed active and eligible to open a business bank account.
This account must be held with a bank authorised to operate with pecuniary institutions in the polity. Among the fundamental conditions is depositing the firm’s authorised share capital into this dedicated account. The bank will assess the origin of the funds and verify the reputability of the firm’s shareholders. Transparent and well-recorded pecuniary records at this stage will help to prevent delays. The bank account must remain active throughout the licensing sequence and until the firm receives official authorization to operate.
This dossier must demonstrate pecuniary soundness, managerial competence, and adherence to technological and operational norms. Key records include the firm’s charter and enlistment forms, proof of capital sources, details of the internal control framework, AML/KYC policies, technical specifications of the software platform, client and market information, equally an overview of the mercantile model and projected transaction volumes. All records must be prepared in Spanish and officially notarised. Given the strict scrutiny applied, engaging licit experts at this stage is advisable to lessen the peril of rejection and to expedite the sequence.
The SSF conducts an in-depth audit of the firm’s corporate structure, capital adequacy, personnel qualifications, and internal supervisory frameworks. A particular focus is placed on peril oversight systems, fraud prevention protocols, and data protection mechanisms. The regulator also evaluates information concerning the ultimate beneficial owners, sources of financing, and the licit background of the founders. Additionally, the viability and transparency of the mercantile model are closely assessed to determine whether the firm can operate reliably within the pecuniary system.
If the application includes components related to foreign exchange operations, cross-border remittances, or cryptocurrency usage, the Banco Central de Reserva (BCR) may become involved. In such cases, the central bank conducts its own technical review and may offer guidance or additional recommendations. Nonetheless, the final decision on whether to grant the warrant remains with the SSF.
This official authorisation enables the firm to commence operations as outlined in its application. The mercantile can now onboard clients, issue reports, and engage with domestic and international pecuniary entities. However, ongoing compliance with all supervisory norms is mandatory. Should the firm wish to expand its service offerings, it must file supplementary applications for approval. Operations can be carried out within the polity or internationally, provided all currency control and supervisory onuses are met.
Taxation of payment platforms in El Salvador
Taxation plays a crucial role in shaping the sequence of obtaining a payment system licence in El Salvador. The country follows the territorial taxation principle, meaning it only levies income generated within its borders, including remittance aids provided to clients located in the polity.
Regarding corporate income excise, the standard rate is 30%, applicable to all taxable income. However, a reduced rate of 25% applies if a firm's annual income exceeds US$150,000. This excise is assessed on an accrual basis and is only relevant to income generated within the national territory. This is a significant consideration when registering a remittance system, as deals conducted outside the country are not subject to corporate income excise.
In addition to corporate income excise, other levies come into play. The VAT applies to all paid services, including electronic transfers, at a rate of 13%. The taxable amount is based on the remuneration received for the service provided. Payment service providers (PSPs) are needed to issue invoices showing the VAT, submit monthly reports, and maintain separate records of excise liabilities. Specific exemptions apply to certain aids, but these do not typically extend to the fintech sector. However, remittances made for export aids are taxed at a zero rate, which prevents double taxation on cross-border deals.
Payment companies must also pay advance excise remittances, which are calculated at a rate of 1.75% of their gross accrued income each month. These advance remittances are credited against the main income excise due at the end of the fiscal year. Applicants seeking to warrant a remittance system in the polity should account for these advance remittances when estimating their operating budget.
Payment companies must also pay advance excise remittances, which are calculated at a rate of 1.75% of their gross accrued income each month. These advance remittances are credited against the main income excise due at the end of the fiscal year. Applicants seeking to warrant a remittance system in the polity should account for these advance remittances when estimating their operating budget.
Municipal levies are another factor to consider, as each municipality has the authority to set its own rates. These levies apply to the assets of a firm located within a given municipality, so the location of the mercantile and its office is an important consideration when applying for a remittance institution warrant.
For payment providers, the region offers several excise benefits, particularly for companies that operate within innovative or digital models. Law No. 405 establishes free economic zones where mercantiles can enjoy significant excise exemptions, including relief from corporate income excise, VAT, municipal fees, and import duties on machinery and equipment. Companies operating within these zones, particularly those focused on exports or international trade, can apply for a remittance system warrant and conduct mercantile without incurring these key levies. Additionally, being located in a free zone facilitates the licensing sequence, especially for mercantiles in logistics, digital aids, or those serving international clients.
Law No. 431, known as the International Services Law, offers similar excise benefits but applies specifically to transaction processing centres and IT-based aids. This law benefits companies offering remote aids, such as software solutions or customer support, and is particularly relevant for mercantiles planning to implement cloud-based or API-integrated remittance systems.
Finally, from 2023, the Law on the Promotion of Technological and Industrial Innovations supplies further incentives for remittance platforms. This includes a 15-year exemption from key levies such as income excise, municipal fees, capital gains excise, and customs duties on imported equipment and software. These incentives are particularly valuable for companies engaged in data analytics, blockchain technology, machine learning, digital identity, and cybersecurity. For those seeking a remittance aids warrant in the polity, highlighting involvement in these areas could automatically qualify the mercantile for preferential treatment under this law.
Accounting and reporting
Pecuniary institutions, including remittance platforms, must maintain comprehensive and formal records of all deals, a sequence that is subject to strict national directives and oversight by the overseers that issue payment system licences in El Salvador. These organisations employ the accrual accounting method, meaning that revenues and expenses are recognised at the time they occur, rather than when the corresponding funds are actually received. This applies to both remittances made to customers and internal transfers between different firm departments.
A payment system licence in El Salvador mandates the establishment of a transparent pecuniary structure, which includes keeping accurate journal entries, preparing cash flow statements, and providing detailed descriptions of settlement positions. The excise base is calculated based on gross income, with deductions made for expenses directly linked to the facilitation of remittance schemes. These expenses must be economically valid, thoroughly recorded, and clearly reflected in the firm’s accounting policy.
Organisations are needed to submit an annual excise return for profits, while VAT returns are submitted on a monthly basis. Additionally, separate forms are needed for advance remittances, municipal levies, and insurance contributions. When applying for a warrant in the polity, companies must prepare an accounting model that complies with the needs set by Central de Reserva and the local tax authority.
AML reporting is submitted separately to the supervisory authority, detailing deals that exceed specified limits and providing information on the parties involved in those deals. Non-abidance with these reporting onuses can lead to the suspension or even revocation of the payment platform’s operating licence in El Salvador.
Banking services for payment platforms
The functioning of a remittance system cannot occur without comprehensive banking aids. In the polity, distinct directives govern access to pecuniary aids for electronic remittance providers. When registering a remittance system, one of the essential needs is to open a current account with a national bank.
The bank must verify the identity of the client, assess the source of funds, and determine the associated peril level. This sequence involves conveying corporate records, including articles of association, beneficiary information, and a thorough explanation of the mercantile model. The opening of such an account is a compulsory condition when applying for a payment system licence in El Salvador.
The accounts can support multiple currencies, which is particularly important for platforms dealing in both US dollars and digital assets. Some banks facilitate direct integration with cryptocurrency gateways, enabling smoother handling of mixed deals.
Banking aids also encompass the ability to connect to acquiring networks, issue cards, monitor currency deals, and generate reports in a format that aligns with supervisory needs. The remittance platform must maintain an adequate reserve of funds, which is determined based on the volume of deals and the balance of clients' accounts. These stipulations are outlined in the agreement with the bank and are subject to scrutiny during the licensing sequence of the remittance system.
A specific supervisory framework applies to deals with foreign banks. For cross-border schemes, platforms must adhere to currency control directives and comply with international sanctions lists. Failure to meet these onuses can result in restricted access to the settlement network.
Benefits and perils of opening a payment system in El Salvador
The benefits and perils of launching a payment platform in El Salvador form the basis for a strategic decision to enter the market. On the one hand, the jurisdiction offers unique conditions - from liberal legislation to support for digital assets. On the other hand, it requires strict abidance with directives and adaptation to an unstable supervisory sphere. In order for the registration of a license for a payment system in El Salvador to become a tool for scaling, it is important to evaluate both the opportunities and limitations.
Benefits of launching a payment system in El Salvador
A crucial aspect when selecting a jurisdiction is the level of supervisory flexibility it offers. El Salvador’s payment system licensing is governed by progressive legislation, which supports the use of digital assets, blockchain deals, and hybrid settlement models. The licit framework does not demand extensive preliminary certifications, enabling mercantiles to commence operations in a relatively short time frame.
Platforms that are granted authorisation under the country’s laws can access the entire Latin American market. The polity's strategic geographical location offers logistical benefits and aligns well with the licit frameworks of numerous other nations. This makes it an especially advantageous jurisdiction for projects focused on providing cross-border aids.
Moreover, the polity benefits from a streamlined tax administration and reporting system, VAT exemptions on exports, and the opportunity to benefit from incentives provided by the Technological Innovation Act. When combined with the relatively low barriers to entry, these features ensure a swift licensing sequence, enabling mercantiles to launch operations with minimal operational costs.
Perils and limitations
While there are clear benefits to operating a payment service provider in El Salvador, it is equally important to consider the supervisory challenges involved. Payment operators are subject to oversight from multiple supervisory overseers, and every transaction is closely monitored. Failure to meet reporting onuses can result in penalties. To obtain a PSP warrant in the polity, mercantiles must adhere to stringent internal norms for AML and KYC sequences. They are also needed to maintain pecuniary reserves and supply detailed analytical reports about their clients.
Abidance needs in the polity are rigorously enforced. Regulators demand thorough verification of clients’ sources of funds, routine updates to customer profiles, and strict adherence to internal audit and monitoring processes. Any breach of these needs is automatically detected and can lead to consequences such as the suspension of individual deals or even the complete revocation of a firm's operating warrant.
Another critical consideration is the instability of the licit sphere. Although the polity maintains a relatively stable excise regime, directives concerning digital assets are subject to change. This uncertainty affects the licensing sequence for cryptocurrency aids and the rules surrounding cross-border data transfers. Therefore, companies must commit to continuous licit oversight even after securing a payment institution (PI) warrant.
Additionally, international scrutiny presents a further peril. The polity’s adoption of Bitcoin as licit tender has drawn global attention and could complicate access to international banking networks and pecuniary transaction systems outside the country. Mercantiles must be prepared to navigate these external pressures while maintaining abidance within the polity's evolving supervisory landscape.
Final word
The polity presents a rare and promising sphere for launching and expanding a digital remittance mercantile. With cryptocurrency recognised as an official medium of exchange, the country offers considerable flexibility in remittance methods and supplies attractive excise benefits specifically designed to encourage the growth of fintech enterprises. However, despite these advantages, securing a licence to operate a payment system in El Salvador demands full abidance with a strict set of licit, technical, and supervisory norms. The success of the enlistment sequence largely hinges on meticulous record preparation, adherence to supervisory frameworks, and the platform’s ability to maintain clear and transparent pecuniary reporting.
Navigating the licensing sequence smoothly requires expert guidance. Engaging licit professionals with expertise in the polity’s supervisory landscape can significantly streamline the sequence, helping to avoid unnecessary delays or application rejections. Experienced consultants not only assist in obtaining the mandatory licences but also play a crucial role in ensuring the long-term stability and abidance of the mercantile within the local market. Their support is invaluable for adapting the project to the specific licit sphere, ultimately laying a strong foundation for sustainable growth.
Our telegram channel
